Abstract
Organizations gain insight and derive value from data that drive their direction, and so data governance, which is a method of managing competitive data, is becoming more important. Researchers have recognized the importance of data governance and introduced various solutions, but the standards and scope of data governance vary, and integrated standards for data governance components need to be established. The purpose of this study is to define the concept of complex data governance and develop a framework for it by defining the data governance components. Using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory method and content analysis, we identified the data governance components and analyzed the influence of their relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garvey G (1993) Facing the bureaucracy: living and dying in a public agency. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Fontela E, Gabus A (1976) The DEMATEL observer. Battelle Institute, Geneva Research Center, Geneva
Li CW, Tzeng GH (2009) Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall. Expert Syst Appl 36:9891–9898
Jankowicz D (2004) The easy guide to repertory grids. Graduate Business School University of Luton, Luton UK
DAMA (2009) The DAMA Guide to the data management body of knowledge. DAMA
Otto B (2011) Data Governance. Bus Inf Syst Eng 3(4):241–244
Thomas G (2006) The DGI data governance framework. The Data Governance Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
Kelle O (2015) Top 10 artifacts needed for data governance. First San Francisco Partners
Vijay K, Brown CV (2010) Designing data governance. Commun ACM 53(1):148–152
Kristin W, Boris O, Hubert O (2009) One size does not fit all: best practices for data governance. ACM J Data Inf Qual 1(1):8–22
Laudon KC, Jane P (2002) Management information systems 12/E. In: Managing the digital firm. Pearson Education Asia
SAS institute Inc (2014) The SAS data governance framework: a blueprint for success. SAS institute Inc. (2014).
Begg C, Caira T (2012) Exploring the SME quandary: data governance in practise in the small to medium-sized enterprise sector. Electron J Inf Syst Eval 15(1):3–13
Korhonen JJ, Melleri I, Hiekkanen K, Helenius M (2013) Designing data governance structure: an organizational perspective. GSTF J Comput 2(4):11–17
DeStefano RJ, Tao L, Gai K (2016) Improving data governance in large organizations through ontology and linked data. In: 2016 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud). IEEE.
Neff A et al (2013) Explicating performance impacts of it governance and data governance in multi-business organisations. In: 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS). RMIT University
Telecommunications Technology Association (2011) Data governance part 5: framework, TTA
IBM (2007) The IBM data governance council maturity model: building a roadmap for effective data governance. IBM
SambaSoup (2011) Data governance. In: IS6120 enterprise business intelligence (2011)
Weber K, Otto B, Österle H (2009) One size does not fit all—a contingency approach to data governance. J Data Inf Qual 1(1):4:1–4:27
Nunnally JC (1967) Psychometric theory, 1/E. McGraw-Hill, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jang, Ka., Kim, WJ. Development of data governance components using DEMATEL and content analysis. J Supercomput 77, 3695–3709 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03405-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03405-9