Skip to main content
Log in

Design of CMOS QVCO with high-Q symmetric differential inductor for wireless LAN

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phase noise performance and current consumption of radio frequency (RF) voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) are largely dependent on the Quality (Q) factor of inductor–capacitor (LC) tank. Because the Q-factor of the LC tank is determined by an on-chip differential inductor, we designed, analyzed, and modeled the differential inductor using the high-frequency structure simulator software (HFSS), we could estimate the Q-factor and inductance of the differential symmetric inductor, to enhance the differential Q-factor, reduce current consumption and save silicon area. To verify its use in RF applications, we designed a 5 GHz differential LC-QVCO. Because accurate quadrature local oscillator (LO) signal is a key element in modern wireless transceivers, especially for direct conversion transceivers which are proliferating in a wide range of RF communication systems. Quadrature LO can be obtained by letting VCO oscillate at double the desired frequency and dividing its output. The higher oscillation frequency and frequency division circuitry, however, results in increased power consumption. Quadrature LO can also be obtained by feeding the differential outputs of the VCO oscillating at the desired frequency to a polyphase filter which is usually implemented as an RC network. This scheme results in substantial power consumption as well due to the LO buffers required to compensate for the loss of the passive filter. The third method of quadrature LO generation is QVCO where two symmetric LC-tank VCOs are coupled to each other. To obtain a smaller chip area and higher Q-factor, herein we designed a high-performance symmetric differential inductor for IEEE 802.11a and used it to design a quadrature voltage-controlled oscillator (QVCO). Using the high-frequency structure simulator software (HFSS), we could estimate the Q-factor and inductance of the differential symmetric inductor. Using a 0.13-μm CMOS process, the proposed differential inductor was designed with a width of 20 μm, the outer diameter of 244 μm, and spacing of 2 μm, with a two-turn octagonal structure. At 5 GHz, the Q-factor of the differential inductor was 14. Application of the symmetric differential inductor to Quadrature VCO improves output voltage swing and phase noise by 75% and 10 dB, respectively (for a given power consumption), while silicon chip area is reduced by 35% compared to conventional single inductor equivalents. Furthermore, a QVCO with a wide operating range (20% of 4.5–5.5 GHz) was designed. The phase noise of the QVCO was − 119.6 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset from 5.15 GHz. The output phase error of the proposed QVCO was less than 0.5°, and the total power consumption at 1.2 V was 5.4 mW. The QVCO proposed in this study was designed to achieve a smaller chip area and higher Q-factor, and will be available for use in IEEE 802.11a transceiver chips for 5.15–5.35 GHz Wireless-LAN in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee M (2010) Direct-conversion receiver for 5GHz Wireless LAN in CMOS Technology. Dissertation, Hanyang University

  2. Perttula A, Tuomi P, Kiili K et al (2013) Enriching shared experience by collective heart rate. Int J Soc Humanist Comput 2(1–2):31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alsuraisry H, Cheng J-H, Li W-T et al (2017) An integrated Ka-band VCO and divide-by-4 frequency divider with 30.2% tuning range in 90-nm CMOS. Microw Opt Technol Lett 59(6):1306–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee M-Y, Yoo C (2007) A CMOS multi-phase shifting network with RC-CR filter and bias-level scaled active interpolator. Microw Opt Technol Lett 49(1):118–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Z, Wang M, Chen JX, Liang WF, Yan PP, Zhai JF, Hong W (2017) Linear CMOS LC-VCO Based on triple-coupled inductors and its application to 40-GHz phase-locked loop. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Technol 65:2977–2989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li D, Liu D, Kang Ch, Zou X (2017) A low power low phase noise oscillator for MICS transceivers. Sensors (Basel) 17(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Poor MA, Esmaeeli O, Sheikhaei S (2019) A low phase noise quadrature VCO using superharmonic injection, current reuse, and negative resistance techniques in CMOS technology. Analog Integr Circuits Signal Process 99(1):633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang B, Luong HC (2017) A 7.9-Ghz transformer-feedback quadrature oscillator with a noise-shifting coupling network. IEEE J Solid State Circuits 52(10):2636–2646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ding X, Wu J, Chen C (2019) A low-power 0.6-V quadrature VCO with a coupling current reuse technique. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Express Briefs 66(2):202–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sivaramakrishna R, Gupta S (2018) A wide operating range LC quadrature phase VCO with seamless tenability. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Express Briefs 65(12):1914–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Loveless TD et al (2017) Combined effects of total ionizing dose and temperature on a k-band quadrature LC-tank VCO in a 32nm CMOS SOI technology. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 64(1):204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rofougaran A (1996) A 900 MHz CMOS LC-oscillator with quadrature outputs. In: Proceeding of International Solid-State Circuits Virtual Conference 1996 (ISSCC), pp 392–393

  13. Hemmati MJ, Dehghani R, Hakimi A (2019) A low-voltage swing-enhanced Colpitts CMOS LC-QVCO based on first-harmonics coupling. Microelectron J 85:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang S, Chen P-H (2016) A low-phase-noise and wide-tuning-range CMOS/IPD transformer-based VCO with high FoMT of −206.8 dBc/Hz. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Manuf Technol 6:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu F, Tang Q, Wang W, Wu H (2016) A 2.7 GHz low-phase-noise LC-QVCO using the gate-modulated coupling technique. Wirel Pers Commun 86(2):671–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng K-W, Je M (2013) A current-switching and -enhanced colpitts quadrature VCO. IEEE Microw Wirel Compon Lett 23(3):143–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hemmati MJ, Dehghani R, Hakimi A, Hejad SN (2018) Low-power Gm-boosted complementary Colpitts LC-VCO/QVCO. Analog Integr Circuits Signal Process 97:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jafari B, Sheikhaei S (2017) Phase noise reduction in a CMOS LC cross coupled oscillator using a novel tail current noise second harmonic filtering technique. Microelectron J 65:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jafari B, Sheikhaei S (2018) A low phase noise super–harmonic coupling quadrature VCO using an additional double frequency oscillator. Microelectron J 80:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jhon H, Kim M-S, Kang M (2019) Cost-effective 4 GHz VCO using only miniature spirals realized in a 0.18 μm CMOS. Process Wirel Sens Netw (WSN) Appl Electron 8(11):1369

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu W, Yang H, Gao T, Zhang H (2013) A dual-band quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency. J Semicond 34(8):085002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hemmati MJ, Hakimi A (2018) A CMOS quadrature VCO with optimized Colpitts topology for low-voltage applications. Microelectron J 72:32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chun CH, Choi HS, Diep BQ et al (2011) Compact wideband LC VCO with active inductor harmonic filtering technique. IEE J Electron Lett 47(3):190–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jagtap S, Anmadwar S, Rudrapati S, Gupta S (2019) A single-event transient-tolerant high-frequency CMOS quadrature phase oscillator. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 66(9):2072–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gharpurey R (1995) Modeling and analysis of substrate coupling in integrated circuits, Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

  26. Son M, Yoo J, Kang I, Lee C, Kim J, Park HJ, Park YB et al (2017) RF CMOS power amplifier using a split inter-stage inductor for IEEE 802.11 n applications. Int J Micro Wirel Technol 9(4):719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sim Y, Park J, Yoo J, Lee C, Park C (2017) A CMOS power amplifier using an active Balun as a driver stage to enhance its gain. Microelectron J 63:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee C, Park C (2019) Switching-mode CMOS power amplifier using a differentially coupled series inductor. Prog Electromagn Res Lett 81:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jang S, Lee C, Park C (2019) Differential 2.4-GHz CMOS power amplifier using an asymmetric differential inductor to improve linearity. J Korea Inst Inf Commun Eng 23(6):726–732

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jafari B, Sheikhaei S (2019) A low phase noise super–harmonic coupling quadrature VCO using an additional double frequency oscillator. Microelectron J 65:34–45

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MIST) (2018R1D1A1B07044131).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byungjoo Park.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, M., Park, B. Design of CMOS QVCO with high-Q symmetric differential inductor for wireless LAN. J Supercomput 77, 13788–13805 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03796-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03796-3

Keywords

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy