Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Traffic-aware dynamic controller placement in SDN using NFV

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) are promising technologies for delivering software-based networks to the user community. The application of Machine Learning (ML) in SDN and NFV enables innovation and easiness towards network management. The shift towards the softwarization of networks broadens the many doors of innovation and challenges. As the number of devices connected to the Internet is increasing swiftly, the SDNFV traffic management mechanism will provide a better solution. Many ML techniques applied to SDN focus more on the classification problems like network attack patterns, routing techniques, QoE/QoS provisioning. The approach of the application of ML to SDNFV and SDN controller placement has a lot of scope to explore. This work aims to develop an ML approach for network traffic management by predicting the number of controllers likely to be placed in the network. The proposed prediction mechanism is a centralized one and deployed as Virtual Network Function (VNF) in the NFV environment. The number of controllers is estimated using the predicted traffic and placed in the optimal location using the K-Medoid algorithm. The proposed method is suitably analysed for performances metrics. The proposed approach effectively combines SDN, NFV and ML for the better achievement of network automation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

This manuscript contains no associated data.

References

  1. Cisco U (2020) Cisco annual internet report (2018–2023) white paper. Cisco: San Jose, CA, USA, vol 10, no 1, pp 1–35

  2. Farhady H, Lee H, Nakao A (2015) Software-defined networking: a survey. Comput Netw 81(4):79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almadani B, Beg A, Mahmoud A (2021) Dsf: a distributed sdn control plane framework for the east/west interface. IEEE Access 9(1):26735–26754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heller B, Sherwood R, McKeown N (2012) The controller placement problem. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 42(4):473–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellerer W, Kalmbach P, Blenk A, Basta A, Reisslein M, Schmid S (2019) Adaptable and data-driven softwarized networks: review, opportunities and challenges. Proc IEEE 107(4):711–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie J, Yu FR, Huang T, Xie R, Liu J, Wang C, Liu Y (2018) A survey of machine learning techniques applied to software defined networking (SDN): research issues and challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 21(1):393–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao Y, Li Ye, Zhang X, Geng G, Zhang W, Sun Y (2019) A survey of networking applications applying the software defined networking concept based on machine learning. IEEE Access 7(1):95385–95405

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lange S, Gebert S, Zinner T, Tran-Gia P, Hock D, Jarschel M, Hoffmann M (2015) Heuristic approaches to the controller placement problem in large scale SDN networks. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 12(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang T, Giaccone P, Bianco A, De Domenico S (2017) The role of the inter-controller consensus in the placement of distributed SDN controllers. Comput Commun 113(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mouawad N, Naja R, Tohme S (2018) Optimal and dynamic SDN controller placement. In: 2018 International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA), vol 1, no 1, pp 1–9

  11. Liao J, Sun H, Wang J, Qi Qi, Li K, Li T (2017) Density cluster-based approach for controller placement problem in large-scale software defined networkings. Comput Netw 112(1):24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao P, Li Z-Y, Guo S, Qi H, Wen-yu Qu, Hai-sheng Yu (2016) A K self-adaptive SDN controller placement for wide area networks. Front Inf Technol Electron Eng 17(7):620–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao P, Qu W, Qi H, Xu Y, Li Z (2015) An efficient elephant flow detection with cost-sensitive in SDN. In: 2015 1st International Conference on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems (INISCom), vol 1, no 1, pp 24–28

  14. Amaral P, Dinis J, Pinto P, Bernardo L, Tavares J, Mamede HS (2016) Machine learning in software defined networks: data collection and traffic classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ICNP’16, Singapore, vol 1, no 1, pp 1–5

  15. Raikar MM, Meena SM, Mulla MM, Shetti NS, Karanandi M (2020) Data traffic classification in software defined networks (SDN) using supervised-learning. Proc Comput Sci 171(1):2750–2759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Indira B, Valarmathi K, Devaraj D (2019) An approach to enhance packet classification performance of software-defined network using deep learning. Soft Comput 23(18):8609–8619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabbeh A, Al-Dunainawi Y, Al-Raweshidy HS, Abbod MF (2016) Performance prediction of software defined network using an artificial neural network. In: 2016 SAI Computing Conference (SAI), vol 1, no 1, pp 80–84

  18. Xie J, Yu FR, Huang T, Xie R, Liu J, Wang C, Liu Y (2018) A survey of machine learning techniques applied to software defined networking (SDN): research issues and challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 21(1):393–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamdan M, Mohammed B, Humayun U, Abdelaziz A, Khan S, Ali MA, Imran M, Marsono MN (2020) Flow-aware elephant flow detection for software-defined networks. IEEE Access 8(1):72585–72597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tripathy BK, Sahoo KS, Luhach AK, Jhanjhi NZ, Jena SK (2020) A virtual execution platform for OpenFlow controller using NFV. J King Saud Univers Comput Inf Sci 34(3):964–971

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bu C, Wang X, Huang M, Li K (2017) SDNFV-based dynamic network function deployment: model and mechanism. IEEE Commun Lett 22(1):93–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramakrishnan KK (2016) Software-based networks: leveraging high-performance NFV platforms to meet future communication challenges. In: 2016 IEEE 36th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), vol 1, no 1, p 24

  23. Nanda S, Zafari F, DeCusatis C, Wedaa E, Yang B (2016) Predicting network attack patterns in SDN using machine learning approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE NFV-SDN’16, Palo Alto, CA, USA, vol 1, no 1, pp 167–172

  24. Ejaz S, Iqbal Z, Shah PA, Bukhari BH, Ali A, Aadil F (2019) Traffic load balancing using software defined networking (SDN) controller as virtualized network function. IEEE Access 7(1):46646–46658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kwon J, Jung D, Park H (2020) Traffic data classification using machine learning algorithms in SDN networks. In: 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC) vol 1, no 1, pp 1031–1033

  26. Ramya G, Manoharan R (2021) Enhanced optimal placements of multi-controllers in SDN. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 12(7):8187–8204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramya G, Manoharan R (2021) Prediction based dynamic controller placements in SDN. EAI Endors Trans Scalable Inf Syst 8(32):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wani A, Khaliq R (2021) SDN-based intrusion detection system for IoT using deep learning classifier (IDSIoT-SDL). CAAI Trans Intell Technol 6(3):281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaur K, Singh J, Ghumman NS (2014) Mininet as software defined networking testing platform. In: International Conference on Communication, Computing and Systems (ICCCS), vol 1, no 1, pp 139–42

  30. Knight S, Nguyen HX, Falkner N (2011) Rhys Bowden and Matthew Roughan “The Internet Topology Zoo. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 29(9):1765–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pondicherry Enginnering College, Puducherry, 605014, India

    G. Ramya & R. Manoharan

Authors
  1. G. Ramya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Manoharan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Ramya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramya, G., Manoharan, R. Traffic-aware dynamic controller placement in SDN using NFV. J Supercomput 79, 2082–2107 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04717-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04717-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy