Abstract
In online shopping, most of consumers will not clear their return reasons when submitting return requests (e.g., select the option “other reasons”). Prior literature mostly investigates into the return event at the transaction level, and the underlying force of returns remains untracked. To deal with this problem, we propose a machine learning algorithm named as trust-aware random walk model (TARW). In the proposed model, four patterns of consumers can be identified in terms of return forces: (i) selfish consumers, (ii) honest consumers, (iii) fraud consumers, and (iv) irrelevant consumers. To profile consumers’ return patterns, we capture consumers’ similarities in order preferences and return tendencies separately. Based on consumers’ similarities, we obtain a return pattern trust network by introducing the trust network and collaborative filtering algorithms. Subsequently, we develop two important applications based on the trust network: (i) estimating consumers’ return propensities for product types; (ii) scoring the anomaly for consumers’ returns for one product. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments with the real-world data to validate the model’s effectiveness in predicting and tracing consumers’ returns. With the proposed model, we can help retailers improve the conversion rates of selfish consumers, retain honest consumers, and block fraud consumers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fu Y, Liu G, Papadimitriou S, et al. Fused latent models for assessing product return propensity in online commerce. Decis Support Syst, 2016, 91: 77–88
Dutta S, Biswas A, Grewal D. Regret from postpurchase discovery of lower market prices: do price refunds help? J Marketing, 2011, 75: 124–138
Potdar A, Rogers J. Reason-code based model to forecast product returns. Foresight, 2012, 14: 105–120
Wood S L. Remote purchase environments: the influence of return policy leniency on two-stage decision processes. J Marketing Res, 2001, 38: 157–169
Ang L, Dubelaar C, Lee B C. To trust or not to trust? A model of internet trust from the customer’s point of view. In: Proceedings of BLED 2001, Bled Austria, 2001. 43
Zacharia G, Moukas A, Maes P. Collaborative reputation mechanisms for electronic marketplaces. Decis Support Syst, 2000, 29: 371–388
Dellarocas C. The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manage Sci, 2003, 49: 1407–1424
Zhang Y, Liu T, Li R, et al. Evaluation model of buyers’ dynamic reputation in e-commerce. Int J Multimed Ubiquit Eng, 2015, 10: 53–64
Grace A M, Williams S O. Comparative analysis of neural network and fuzzy logic techniques in credit risk evaluation. Int J Intell Inf Technol, 2016, 12: 47–62
Gunn S R. Support vector machines for classification and regression. ISIS Technical Report. 1998
Lee T S, Chiu C C, Lu C J, et al. Credit scoring using the hybrid neural discriminant technique. Expert Syst Appl, 2002, 23: 245–254
Jin L P, Dong J. Classification of normal and abnormal ECG records using lead convolutional neural network and rule inference. Sci China Technol Sci, 2017, 60: 078103
Jiang J, Li Y J, Feng Q Y, et al. A multiple user sharing behaviors based approach for fake file detection in P2P environments. Sci China Inf Sci, 2010, 53: 2169–2184
Massa P, Avesani P. Trust-aware collaborative filtering for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems. Berlin: Springer Press, 2004. 492–508
Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, et al. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web. Raleigh: ACM Press, 2001. 285–295
Shepitsen A, Gemmell J, Mobasher B, et al. Personalized recommendation in social tagging systems using hierarchical clustering. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. Lausanne: ACM Press, 2008. 259–266
Yang X W, Guo Y, Liu Y. Bayesian-inference-based recommendation in online social networks. IEEE Trans Parall Distrib Syst, 2013, 24: 642–651
Qian Y, Peng Z Y, Liang H, et al. A latent topic based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm for web communities. In: Proceedings of 2012 Web Information Systems and Applications Conference. Hainan: IEEE Press, 2012. 241–246
Chen D E, Ying Y L. A collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on bipartite graph. Adv Mater Res, 2013, 756: 3865–3868
Rong H G, Zhou X, Yang C, et al. The rich and the poor: a Markov decision process approach to optimizing taxi driver revenue efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM). Indianapolis: ACM Press, 2016. 2329–2334
Yu W. Analysis on trust influencing factors and trust model from multiple perspectives of online Auction. Cent Eur J Phys, 2017, 15: 613–619
Fouss F, Pirotte A, Renders J, et al. Random-walk computation of similarities between nodes of a graph with application to collaborative recommendation. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 2007, 19: 355–369
Haveliwala T H. Topic-sensitive pagerank: a context-sensitive ranking algorithm for web search. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 2003, 15: 784–796
Sun J, Qu H, Chakrabarti D, et al. Neighborhood formation and anomaly detection in bipartite graphs. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Houston: IEEE Press, 2005. 8
Jamali M, Ester M. Trustwalker: a random walk model for combining trust-based and item-based recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Paris: ACM Press, 2009. 397–406
Jeh G, Widom J. SimRank: a measure of structural-context similarity. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Edmonton: ACM Press, 2002. 538–543
Zhang Z, Zeng D D, Abbasi A, et al. A random walk model for item recommendation in social tagging systems. ACM Trans Manage Inf Syst, 2013, 4: 1–24
Alexandridis G, Siolas G, Stafylopatis A. Accuracy versus novelty and diversity in recommender systems: a nonuniform random walk approach. In: Recommendation and Search in Social Networks. Berlin: Springer Press, 2015. 41–57
Gong J B, Gao X X, Cheng H, et al. Integrating a weighted-average method into the random walk framework to generate individual friend recommendations. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 110104
Smith W R. Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. J Marketing, 1956, 21: 3–8
Azzedin F, Maheswaran M. Evolving and managing trust in grid computing systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. Winnipeg: IEEE Press, 2002. 1424–1429
Travers J, Milgram S. The small world problem. Psychol Today, 1967, 1: 61–67
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB-1004300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61773199, 71732002), and Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. 2017SJB0006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Zhuang, Y., Fu, Y. et al. A trust-aware random walk model for return propensity estimation and consumer anomaly scoring in online shopping. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 62, 52101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9511-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9511-1