Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and weighted overlay method: a case study from NW Himalayas, Pakistan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslide susceptibility map is very important for engineers, geologist, and land use planner for prevention and mitigation of landslide hazard in the area. This paper presents landslide susceptibility analysis for the part of tehsil Balakot, NW Himalayas, Pakistan. In this study, topographical, geological and remote sensing data were collected and processed using geographic information system (GIS) and ERDAS Imagine software. Nine influential causative factors for landslide occurrence were used for this purpose. The causative factors that influence the landslide occurrence include slope, aspect, curvature, elevation, lithology, land cover, faults, road network, and hydrology. These factors were analyzed for construction of thematic data layers. Numerical weight for each factor was assigned by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) using Pairwise Comparison Method. The landslide susceptibility indices were derived using weighted overlay method (WOM). As a result, landslide susceptibility map was produced in GIS. The susceptibility map classified the study area into very high, high, moderate, and low susceptible zones. The results of the susceptibility mapping were verified using the landslide occurrence. The verification results revealed 76 % accuracy. The validated results showed good agreement between landslide occurrence and produced susceptibility map of the area. Susceptibility map prepared by weighted overlay method is validated for landslide hazard, mitigations, and land use planning for future construction in the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed B (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping using multi-criteria evaluation techniques in Chittagong Metropolitan Area, Bangladesh. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-014-0521

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed B. Rubel YA (2013) Understanding the issues involved in urban landslide vulnerability in Chittagong metropolitan area, Bangladesh. The Association of American Geographers (AAG) https://sites.google.com/a/aag.org/mycoe-servirglobal/final-arafat. Assessed 17 January 2014

  • Ahmed MF, Rogers JD, Ismail EH (2014) A regional level preliminary landslide susceptibility study of the upper Indus river basin. Eur J Remote Sens 47:343–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary, review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Springer 2004:34

    Google Scholar 

  • Basharat M, Rohn J (2015) Effects of volume on travel distance of mass movements triggered by the 2005 Kashmir earthquake, in the northeast Himalayas of Pakistan. Nat Hazards 77:273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basharat M, Rohn J, Baig MS, Ehret D (2012) Lithological and structural control of Hattian Bala rock avalanche triggered by the Kashmir earthquake 2005, NW Himalaya, Pakistan. J Earth Sci 23(2):213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basharat M, Rohn J, Baig MS, Khan MR (2014) Spatial distribution analysis of mass movements triggered by the 2005 Kashmir earthquake in the northeast Himalayas of Pakistan. Geomorphology 206:203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baig MS, Lawrence RD (1987) Precambrian to early Paleozoic orogenesis in the Himalaya. Kashmir J Geol 5:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Baig MS, Snee LW (1995) The evidence for Cambro-Ordovician orogeny in northwest Himalayas Pakistan. Geol Soci Am Abstr Program 27:305

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossart P, Dietrich D, Greco A, Ottiger R, Ramsay JG (1988) The tectonic structure of Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis, southern Himalayas, Pakistan. Tectonics 7:273–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenning A (2005) Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazards Earth Sys Sci 5:853–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calkins JA, Offield TW, Abdullah SKM, Ali ST (1975) Geology of the southern Himalaya in Hazara, Pakistan, and adjacent areas. US Geol Sur 716-C:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon J, Irigaray C, Fernandez T, Hamdouni R (2006) Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:341–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Xu C, Yao X, L X, XB T, QM G (2011) Spatial distribution of Landslides triggered by the 2008 Ms 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, China. J. Asian Earth Sci 40(4):883–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning SA, Mitchell WA, Rosser NJ, Petley DN (2007) The Hattian Bala rock avalanche and associated landslides triggered by the Kashmir earthquake of 8 October 2005. Eng Geol 93(3–4):130–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters. 27:861–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2013) GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran. Natural Hazard 65:2105–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorum T, Fan X, van Westen CJ, Huang RQ, Xu Q, Tang C, Wang G (2011) Distribution pattern of earthquake induced landslides triggered by the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Geomorphology 133(3–4):152–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco A (1989) Tectonic and metamorphism of the western Himalayan Syntaxis area (Azad Kashmir NE Pakistan) dissertation ETH Zurich., 8779: 1–113

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain A. Iqbal S. Nasir S (2004) Geological maps of the Garhi Habibullah and Nauseri area, District Muzaffarabad, AJK: Geol. Sur. Pakistan. Preliminary Map Series Vol. No., 14, Sheet No. 43 F/7, 11, 1:50,000

  • Jadoon IAK, Hinderer M, Kausar AB, Qureshi AA, Baig MS, Basharat M, Frisch W (2015) Structural interpretation and geo-hazard assessment of a locking line: 2005 Kashmir earthquake, western Himalayas. Environ Earth Sci 73:7587–7602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John K. Maingi E. Stuart M, William G. Kepner M. Curtis E (2002) Accuracy assessment of 1992 Landsat-MSS derived land cover for the upper San Pedro watershed (U.S./Mexico), United States. Environ Protection Agency. EPA/600/R-02/040

  • Keefer DK (1984) Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geol. Soci. Am. Bull. 95:6–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp U, Growley BJ, Khattak GA, Owen LA (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region. Geomorphology 101(4):631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi AH. Jan MQ (1997) Geology and tectonics of Pakistan. Graphic Publishers, Karachi, Pakistan, 557.

  • Khan, MS (1994) Petrology and geochemistry of the Panjal volcanic in the Azad Kashmir and Kaghan areas of the NW Himalaya. Phd thesis, Univ. Punjab, Pakistan: 270

  • Kaneda H, Nakata T, Tsutsumi H, Kondo H, Sugito N, Awata Y, Akhtar SS, Majid A, Khattak W, Awan AA, Yeats RS, Hussain A, Ashraf M, Wesnousky SG, Kausar AB (2008) Surface rupture of the 2005 Kashmir, Pakistan Earthquake and its active tectonic implications. Bull of the Seismol Soci Am 98:521–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int. J. Remote Sensing 26(7):1477–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew J, Jha V, Rawat G (2007) Weights of evidence modeling for landslide hazard zonation mapping in part of Bhagirathi valley, Uttarakhand. Current Sci 92:628–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York 408

  • Nandi A, Shakoor A (2010) A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Eng Geol 110(1–2):11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen S, Ohler T, Mitchell C (1997) Cowpea leaves for human consumption production, utilization, and nutrient composition. In: Singh B, Mohan Raj D, Dashiell K, Jackai L (eds) Advances in cowpea research. International Institute of tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCASS), Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 326–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen LA, Kamp U, Khattak GA, Harp EL, Keefer DK, Bauer MA (2008) Landslides triggered by the 8 October 2005 Kashmir earthquake. Geomorphology 94:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley DN. Dunning SA. Rosser NJ (2005) The analysis of global landslide risk through the creation of a database of world-wide landslide fatalities, in: Landslide risk management, edited by: Hungr, O., Fell, R., Couture, R., and Eberhardt, E., Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 04 1538 043 X

  • Petley D. Dunning S. Rosser N. Kausar AB (2006) Incipient landslides in the Jhelum valley, Pakistan following the 8th October 2005 earthquake. Disaster mitigation of rock flows, slope failures and landslides by Universal Academy Press, 1-9

  • Pradhan B, Youssef AM, Varathrajoo R (2010) Approaches for delineating landslide hazard areas using different training sites in an advanced artificial neural networks model. Geo-Spat Inf Sci 13(2):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato PH, Hasegawa H, Fujiwara S, Tobita M, Koarai M, Une H, Iwahashi J (2007) Interpretation of landslide distribution triggered by the 2005 northern Pakistan earthquake using SPOT 5 imagery. Landslide 4:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleier M. Bi R. Rohn J. Ehret D. Xiang W (2013) Robust landslide susceptibility analysis by combination of frequency ratio, heuristic GIS-methods and ground truth evaluation for a mountainous study area with poor data availability in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, PR China71: 3007–3023.

  • Spiker EC. Gori PL (2000) National landslide hazards mitigation strategy: a framework for loss reduction. Department of Interior, USGS, open file report. 00-450: 49.

  • Saaty T (1990) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh 502

  • Saaty T (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Services Sci 1:23

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Sci. 240:1285–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeters R van Westen CJ (1996) Slope instability recognition, analysis, and zonation. In A.K. Turner & R.L. Schuster (eds), Landslides—investigation and mitigation: 129–177. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press. National Research Council. Transportation Research Board Special Report 247

  • Wadia DN (1957) Geology of India. Macmillan, London 531

  • Xu C. Shyu JBH. Xu X (2014) Landslides triggered by the 12 January 2010 Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Mw = 7.0 earthquake: visual interpretation, inventory compiling, and spatial distribution statistical analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 14: 1789–1818

  • Zare M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab J Geosci 6(8):2873–2888

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Institute of Geology, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, for providing research facilities and transportation during field visits. We sincerely thank for the anonymous reviewer for his valuable suggestions that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geology, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, 13100, Pakistan

    Muhammad Basharat & Hamid Raza Shah

  2. Planning & Development Department, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, 13100, Pakistan

    Nasir Hameed

Authors
  1. Muhammad Basharat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamid Raza Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nasir Hameed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Basharat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basharat, M., Shah, H.R. & Hameed, N. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and weighted overlay method: a case study from NW Himalayas, Pakistan. Arab J Geosci 9, 292 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2308-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2308-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy