Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials using Three-dimensional Textons

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the recognition of surfaces made from different materials such as concrete, rug, marble, or leather on the basis of their textural appearance. Such natural textures arise from spatial variation of two surface attributes: (1) reflectance and (2) surface normal. In this paper, we provide a unified model to address both these aspects of natural texture. The main idea is to construct a vocabulary of prototype tiny surface patches with associated local geometric and photometric properties. We call these 3D textons. Examples might be ridges, grooves, spots or stripes or combinations thereof. Associated with each texton is an appearance vector, which characterizes the local irradiance distribution, represented as a set of linear Gaussian derivative filter outputs, under different lighting and viewing conditions.

Given a large collection of images of different materials, a clustering approach is used to acquire a small (on the order of 100) 3D texton vocabulary. Given a few (1 to 4) images of any material, it can be characterized using these textons. We demonstrate the application of this representation for recognition of the material viewed under novel lighting and viewing conditions. We also illustrate how the 3D texton model can be used to predict the appearance of materials under novel conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ball, G. and Hall, D. 1967. A clustering technique for summarizing multi-variate data. Behavioral Science, 12:153-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belhumeur, P. and Kriegman, D. 1998. What is the set of images of an object under all possible illumination conditions?. International Journal of Computer Vision, 28(3):245-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, P. and Adelson, E. 1983. The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 31(4):532-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantler, M. 1994. Towards illuminant invariant texture classification. In Proc. IEE Coll. on Texture Classification: Theory and Applications.

  • Chantler, M. and McGunnigle, G. 1995. Compensation of illuminant tilt variation for texture classification. In Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Image Processing and its Applications, pp. 767-771.

  • Chellappa, R. and Chatterjee, S. 1985. Classification of textures using Gaussian Markov random fields. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing, 33(4):959-963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, G. and Jain, A. 1983. Markov random field texture models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 5(1):25-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, K. and Nayar, S. 1998. Histogram model for 3D textures. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 618-624.

  • Dana, K. and Nayar, S. 1999a. 3D textured surface modelling. In Proceedings Workshop on the Integration of Appearance and Geometric Methods in Object Recognition, pp. 46-56.

  • Dana, K. and Nayar, S. 1999b. Correlation model for 3D texture. In Proceedings IEEE 7th International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 2. Corfu, Greece, pp. 1061-1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, K., van Ginneken, B., Nayar, S., and Koenderink, J. 1999. Reflectance and texture of real-world surfaces. ACMTransactions on Graphics, 18(1):1-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bonet, J. and Viola, P. 1998. Texture recognition using a nonparametric multi-scale statistical model. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 641-647.

  • Duda, R. and Hart, P. 1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, John Wiley & Sons. New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efros, A. and Leung, T. 1999. Texture synthesis by non-parametric sampling. In Proceedings IEEE 7th International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 2. Corfu, Greece, pp. 1033-1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, I. and Sagi, D. 1989. Gabor filters as texture discriminator. Biological Cybernetics, 61:103-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S. and Geman, D. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6:721-741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georghiades, A., Kriegman, D., and Belhumeur, P. 1998. Illumination cones for recognition under variable lightin: Faces. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 52-58.

  • Gersho, A. and Gray, R. 1992. Vector Quantization and Signal Compression, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilks, W., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D. 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Chapman and Hall.

  • Haddon, J. and Forsyth, D. 1998. Shading primitives: Finding folds and shallow grooves. In Proceedings IEEE 6th International Conference on Computer Vision, Bombay, India, pp. 236-241.

  • Heeger, D. and Bergen, J. 1995. Pyramid-based texture analysis/ synthesis. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '95 Proceedings), Los Angeles, CA, pp. 229-238.

  • Jain, A. and Farrokhsia, F. 1991. Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters. Pattern Recognition, 24:1167-1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. and Malik, J. 1992. Computational framework to determining stereo correspondence from a set of linear spatial filters. Image and Vision Computing, 10(10):699-708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B. 1981. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature, 290(5802):91-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J. and van Doorn, A. 1980. Photometric invariants related to solid shape. Optica Acta, 27(7):981-996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J. and van Doorn, A. 1996. Illuminance texture due to surface mesostructure. Journal of the Optical Society America A, 13(3):452-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J., van Doorn, A. Dana, K. and Nayar, S. 1999. Bidirectional reflection distribution function of thoroughly pitted surfaces. International Journal of Computer Vision, 31(2/3):129-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, T. and Malik, J. 1997. On perpendicular texture or: Why dowe see more flowers in the distance?. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Juan, Puerto Rico, pp. 807-813.

  • Leung, T. and Malik, J. 1999. Recognizing surfaces using three dimensional textons. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Corfu, Greece.

  • MacQueen, J. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proc. Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Math. Stat. and Prob., Vol. I. pp. 281-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, J., Belongie, S., Shi, J., and Leung, T. 1999. Textons, contours and regions: Cue integration in image segmentation. In Proceedings IEEE 7th International Conference on Computer Vision, Corfu, Greece, pp. 918-925.

  • Malik, J. and Perona, P. 1990. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7(5):923-932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, J. and Jain, A. 1992. Texture classification and segmentation using multiresolution simultaneous autoregressive models. Pattern Recognition, 25(2):173-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murase, H. and Nayar, S. 1995. Visual learning and recognition of 3-D objects from appearance. International Journal on Computer Vision, 14(1):5-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, W., Flannery, B., Teukolsky, S., and Vetterling, W. 1988. Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge University Press.

  • Puzicha, J., Hofmann, T., and Buhmann, J. 1997. Non-parametric similarity measures for unsupervised texture segmentation and image retrieval. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Juan, Puerto Rico, pp. 267-272.

  • Ripley, B. 1996. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, Cambridge University Press.

  • Rubner, Y. and Tomasi, C. 1999. Texture-based image retrieval without segmentation. In Proceedings IEEE 7th International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 2. Corfu, Greece, pp. 1018-1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebestyen, G. 1962. Pattern recognition by an adaptive process of sample set construction. IRE Trans. Info. Theory, 8:S82-S91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shashua, A. 1997. On photometric issues in 3D visual recognition from a single 2D image. International Journal on Computer Vision, 21(1/2).

  • Sirovitch, L. and Kirby, M. 1987. Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2:519-524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, M. and Pentland, A. 1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(1):71-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan, P. 1993. Multirate Systems and Filter Banks, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ginneken, B., Stavridi, M., and Koenderink, J. 1998. Diffuse and specular reflectance from rough surfaces. Applied Optics, 37(1):130-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J. and Rao, S. 1993. Spectral estimation for random fields with applications to Markov modeling and texture classification. In Markov Random Fields: Theory and Application, R. Chellappa and A. Jain (Eds.). Academic Press.

  • Zhu, S., Wu, Y., and Mumford, D. 1998. Filters, random fields and maximum entropy (FRAME): Towards a unified theory for texture modeling. International Journal of Computer Vision, 27(2):107-126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1776, USA

    Thomas Leung & Jitendra Malik

Authors
  1. Thomas Leung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jitendra Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leung, T., Malik, J. Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials using Three-dimensional Textons. International Journal of Computer Vision 43, 29–44 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011126920638

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011126920638

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy