Abstract
The majority of humanities computingprojects within the discipline of literaturehave been conceived more as digital librariesthan monographs which utilise the medium as asite of interpretation. The impetus to conceiveelectronic research in this way comes from theunderlying philosophy of texts and textualityimplicit in SGML and its instantiation for thehumanities, the TEI, which was conceived as ``amarkup system intended for representing alreadyexisting literary texts''. This article exploresthe most common theories used to conceiveelectronic research in literature, such ashypertext theory, OCHO (Ordered Hierarchy ofContent Objects), and Jerome J. McGann's``noninformational'' forms of textuality. It alsoargues that as our understanding of electronictexts and textuality deepens, and as advancesin technology progresses, other theories, suchas Reception Theory and Versioning, may well beadapted to serve as a theoretical basis forconceiving research more akin to an electronicmonograph than a digital library.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DeRose S., Durand D., Mylonas E. (1990) What is Text, Really? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1/2 (Winter).
DeRose S.J., Durand D., Mylonas E., Renear A. (1997) Author's Response to Three Comments on 'What is Text, Really?' Journal of Computer Documentation.
Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange (TEIP3) (1997) In Sperberg-McQueen C.M., Burnard L. (eds.). Text Encoding Initiative, Chicago.
Hockey S., Renear A., McGann J.J. What is Text? A Debate on the Philosophical and Epistemological Nature of Text in the Light of Humanities Computing Research. [http://www.humanities. ualberta.ca/Susan_Hockey/achallc99.htm]
Holub R. (1995) Reception Theory: School of Constance. In Selden R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: From Formalism to Poststructuralism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 319–346.
Horton W. (1994) Designing and Writing Online Documentation, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
Landow G.P. (1997) Hypertext 2.0: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Machan T.W. (1995) Chaucer's Poetry, Versioning and Hypertext. Philological Quarterly, 1/73, pp. 299–316.
McGann J. Rethinking Textuality. [http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/jjm2f/jj2000aweb.html]
Renear A., Mylonas E., Durand D. (1993) Refining Our Notion of What Text Really Is: The Problem of Overlapping Hierarchies. [http://www.stg.brown.edu/resources/stg/monographs/ohco.html]
Renear A. (1997) Theory and Meta-Theory in the Development of Text Encoding. Target paper for The Monist, in circulation in 1996 in the Interactive Monist Seminar. Summary published in The Monist, 80: 3 July. [http://hhobel.phl.univie.ac.at/mii/pesp.html]
Renear A. (1997) Out of Praxis: Three (Meta)Theories of Textuality. In Sutherland K. (ed.), Electronic Textuality: Investigations in Method and Theory, Oxford University Press, pp. 109–126.
Reiman D.H. (1987) Romantic Texts and Contexts. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.
Robinson P.M.W. (1996) Is There a Text in These Variants? The Literary Text in the Digital Age. In Richard R.J. (ed.), The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Shillingsburg P. (1996) Scholarly Editing in the Computer Age: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Sutherland K. (1997) Introduction. In Sutherland K. (ed.), Electronic Textuality: Investigations in Method and Theory, Oxford University Press, pp. 1–18.
Zeller H. (1975) A New Approach to the Critical Constitution of Literary Texts. Studies in Bibliography, 28, pp. 231–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schreibman, S. Computer-mediated Texts and Textuality: Theory and Practice. Computers and the Humanities 36, 283–293 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016178200469
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016178200469