Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-flexbox-1-20160301/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted
, OutOfScope
,
Invalid
, Rejected
, or Retracted
.
Verified
indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Clarify that spatial navigation can honor 'order' From: Cynthia Shelly Comment: [a11y telecon] Response: [a11y telecon] Closed: Accepted Resolved: SF F2F
Issue 2. # Summary: Clarify in 9.8 that auto-height flex containers can also create definiteness From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0121.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0037.html Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/88ade2efb4e8 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0038.html Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. # Summary: Define how child percentages factor into intrinsic size calculations From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0322.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0039.html Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/75be56c11fda Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0044.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0050.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor's discretion (due to review from the competent people above)
Issue 4. # Summary: Aren't absolutely-positioned flex containers always definite? From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0180.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0040.html Note: Added example of “other formula” to Sizing. Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/89ee7fd37001 Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 5. # Summary: Does 9.8 make some sizes *indefinite* that were previously definite From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0319.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0041.html Closed: Invalid Verified: in person
Issue 6. # Summary: What about unresolvable percentages? From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0008.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0042.html Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/342ac9d5c892 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 7. # Summary: Why is a flex item with definite flex basis not definite in an indefinite container? From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0316.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0043.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 8. # Summary: Clarify that inflexible items with definite basis are definite From: fantasai Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0043.html Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/fbcbe170c119 Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0047.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0049.html Closed: Accepted Verified: Reporter is editor Resolved: Editorial
Issue 9. # Summary: Make Implied Minimum Size section easier to understand From: fantasai Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/25641c92d33f Closed: Accepted Verified: Reporter is editor Resolved: Editorial
Issue 10. # Summary: Flexbox's definite/indefinite size definitions are out-of-date From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0434.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0439.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 11. # Summary: Define “inflexible” From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0054.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0057.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 12. # Summary: 'order' effects on abspos unimplemented From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0186.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0347.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0351.html
Issue 13. # Summary: Sync baselines section with Box Alignment From: fantasai Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 14. # Summary: Clarify alignment property effects on static position, esp wrt stretch From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0538.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0368.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 15. # Summary: Make intrinsic sizes definite for percentage resolution From: Christian Biesinger Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0050.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0135.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: SF F2F
Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.
Alternative Proxies: