CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2016-03-01 CR

CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2016-03-01 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-flexbox-1-20160301/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Clarify that spatial navigation can honor 'order'
From:     Cynthia Shelly
Comment:  [a11y telecon]
Response: [a11y telecon]
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: SF F2F
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Clarify in 9.8 that auto-height flex containers can also create definiteness
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0121.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0037.html
Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/88ade2efb4e8
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0038.html
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Define how child percentages factor into intrinsic size calculations
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0322.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0039.html
Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/75be56c11fda
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0044.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0050.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor's discretion (due to review from the competent people above)
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Aren't absolutely-positioned flex containers always definite?
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0180.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0040.html
Note:     Added example of “other formula” to Sizing.
Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/89ee7fd37001
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Does 9.8 make some sizes *indefinite* that were previously definite
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0319.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0041.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: in person
Issue 6. #
Summary:  What about unresolvable percentages?
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0008.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0042.html
Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/342ac9d5c892
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Why is a flex item with definite flex basis not definite in an indefinite container?
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0316.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0043.html
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Clarify that inflexible items with definite basis are definite
From:     fantasai
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0043.html
Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/fbcbe170c119
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0047.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0049.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: Reporter is editor
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Make Implied Minimum Size section easier to understand
From:     fantasai
Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/25641c92d33f
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: Reporter is editor
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Flexbox's definite/indefinite size definitions are out-of-date
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0434.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0439.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Define “inflexible”
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0054.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0057.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 12. #
Summary:  'order' effects on abspos unimplemented
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0186.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0347.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0351.html
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Sync baselines section with Box Alignment
From:     fantasai
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 14. #
Summary:  Clarify alignment property effects on static position, esp wrt stretch
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0538.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0368.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Make intrinsic sizes definite for percentage resolution
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0050.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0135.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: SF F2F
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy