Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20151215/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-writing-modes-3/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Is it possible to choose rotational direction of vertical script if I want to force them to display horizontally? From: gfb hjjhjh Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0200.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0229.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 2. # Summary: ch and ic units From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0078.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0173.html
Issue 3. # Summary: editorial tweaking of text link (Appendix C) From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0402.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 4. # Summary: Add Japanese translation of CSS Writing Modes? From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0024.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0032.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0332.html Closed: OutOfScope / awaiting completion of translation
Issue 5. # Summary: Margins and margin collapsing and writing modes From: Simon Pieters Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0098.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0106.html
Issue 6. # Summary: percentage size of orthogonal box in auto-sized container resolves against ICB From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555#issuecomment-257495761 Closed: Invalid Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555#issuecomment-290103855
Issue 7. # Summary: definition of the central baseline From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/651 Closed: Accepted
Issue 8. # Summary: ::first-letter and initial numbers From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/653 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/653#issuecomment-278147519 Closed: Rejected Verified: Reporter was present at F2F discussion
Issue 9. # Summary: Propose to replace "'text-orientation: upright' to cause strong LTR" with author notes how to do it From: Koji Ishii Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/755 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0042.html
Issue 10. # Summary: Add feature for 90deg clockwise rotation of Mongolian From: gfb hjjhjh Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0203.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0001.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion (no new features principle)
Issue 11. # Summary: Is Old Turkic ttb or btt? From: gfb hjjhjh Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0203.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0001.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 12. # Dup of Issue 4. #
Issue 13. # Summary: Error in Example 17 From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0247.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0016.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 14. # Summary: Typos From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0402.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0007.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 15. # Summary: Typesetting Mongolian upright From: Kari Pihkala Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAE0t3MztPU8yGHStYSHbZ1KvK14A2LQ1myM0VNcxMEh1S8h-bw@mail.gmail.com Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0002.html Closed: Invalid Note: Needs testcase, tracked under https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1792
Issue 16. # Summary: Incorrect cross-linking From: Gérard Talbot Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0008.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0041.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0017.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 17. # Summary: writing-mode display changes should ref parent box not containing block From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0045.html Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1212 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1212#issuecomment-298730762 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1212#issuecomment-298734219
Issue 18. # Summary: percentage size of orthogonal block in auto-sized container From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555#issuecomment-257495761 Closed: Retracted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/555#issuecomment-290103855
Issue 19. # Summary: Definition of central baseline From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/651 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/651#issuecomment-258756432 Closed: Invalid
Issue 20. # Summary: Scope of "non-normative" section unclear From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1307 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1307#issuecomment-298725218 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1307#issuecomment-300310515
Issue 21. # Summary: Orthogonal FLow Constraint: viewport vs scroller From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-303775875 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-316529430 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-320215251 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-330713088 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1391#issuecomment-332581365 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0001.html Verified: Reporter is editor
Issue 22. # Summary: Computed value depends on writing-mode on elements without writing-mode From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1782 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1782#issuecomment-329025447 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0028.html
Issue 23. # Summary: Clarify which axis is described in orthogonal flows sizing note From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1825 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1825#issuecomment-330680353 Closed: Accepted
Issue 24. # Summary: Support direction: auto From: Binyamin Laukstein Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2091 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2091#issuecomment-351490281 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor's discretion (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2091#issuecomment-361448727)
Issue 25. # Summary: Should max-height also limit orthogonal flows From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2239 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2239#issuecomment-361597992 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2239#issuecomment-362006700
Issue 26. # Summary: How do replaced elements work? From: Dennis Heuer Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0056.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0058.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0063.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0076.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0083.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 27. # Summary: Merge 'direction' and 'writing-mode' properties From: Dennis Heuer Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0057.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0059.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0064.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0074.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0081.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion
Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.
Alternative Proxies: