User:Middle 8/COI

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Middle 8 (talk | contribs) at 11:24, 5 September 2015 (ce). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Do practicing acupuncturists have a conflict of interest (COI) when editing acupuncture-related articles?

I understand the argument that they do: they stand to benefit from the positive depiction of acupuncture. On Wikipedia, opinion on the matter is divided, with an RfC on the general question of CAM practitioners finding no consensus, leaning toward "no".

In the "real world", there is evidently no precedent for a CAM-specific COI. I'm aware of no journal, editorial board, or academic department with such a policy. The Cochrane Collaboration produces what we consider to be the highest-level MEDRS's, and they consider CAM professionals to be no more (and no less) conflicted than any medical specialist.[1]

That said, of course I understand the concern, and respect WP:ADVOCACY and WP:PAG generally.

See also: User:Middle 8/Privacy
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy