Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 194.25.112.133 (talk) to last revision by Érico Júnior Wouters (HG)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(42 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 9:
 
 
== '''The Olive Branch''': A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1) ==
==File:Int_bal_graph.png==
That's based on some internal ballistics simulation software I wrote back in college. It is pretty basic stuff, using some basic physics and chemistry to figure out how much gas should be generated, then creating fudge factors for burn rate and friction so that the peak pressure and muzzle velocities matched those for various loads in reloading manuals. I still remember the "Duh!" moment when I finally realized why the velocity results were consistently off by a factor of 11.5--the chamber volume, pressure, and barrel length were in inches, and I was expecting velocity in feet per second... The original code was in QBASIC (which may run in SmallBASIC), and I think I have a C version lying around somewhere, if you want a copy. Standard disclaimers apply--this stuff WILL get you blown up if you try to use if for reloading. [[User:Fluzwup|scot]] ([[User talk:Fluzwup|talk]]) 18:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 
Welcome to the first edition of ''The Olive Branch''. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are [[Wikipedia:Dispute_Resolution_Improvement_Project/NewsletterList|active in DR]], but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to [[Wikipedia:Dispute Resolution Improvement Project/NewsletterOptOut|this page]].
== Is aggregation of primary sources synthesis?- your discusison ==
[[File:Dispute_Resolution_on_the_English_Wikipedia.pdf|thumb|Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow]]
In this issue:
* '''Background''': A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
* '''Research''': The most recent DR data
* '''Survey results''': Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
* '''Activity analysis''': Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
* '''DR Noticeboard comparison''': How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
* '''Discussion update''': Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
* '''Proposal''': It's time to close the [[Wikipedia:Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard|Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard]]. Agree or disagree?
<div style="text-align:center; font-size:larger;">[[Wikipedia:Dispute Resolution Improvement Project/Newsletter|Read the entire first edition of ''The Olive Branch'' -->]]</div>
 
--''The Olive Branch'' 19:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
you should read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus/Morsels_of_wikiwisdom#On_the_importance_of_wikipolitics [[User:Dynsys|Dynsys]] ([[User talk:Dynsys|talk]]) 12:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0345 -->
 
==Talkback==
==Your recent edits==
{{talkback|Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions|Paywalled journal|ts=13:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)}}
[[User:Blackberry Sorbet|Blackberry Sorbet]] <small>([[User talk:Blackberry Sorbet|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Blackberry Sorbet|contribs]])</small> 13:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 
Hi Gsonnenf, I admire your thoughtful work on the articles. [[Special:Contributions/189.115.193.157|189.115.193.157]] ([[User talk:189.115.193.157|talk]]) 15:29, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{ not sure how to or who to ask.... in the Voter Demographics section... is there any data to report info on employed vs unemployed and under employed voters?
==Reminder==
larry.solesbee@usa.net
Alert [[User:Jayjg]] to [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_assistance#Jayjg_accusing_me_of_wikihounding|this thread]], as someone else posted. Sometimes one misses things when they aren't under one's thread name. ''[[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]]'' 18:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 
thanks
== Wikipedia on the wrong side of history ==
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.4.141.167|69.4.141.167]] ([[User talk:69.4.141.167#top|talk]]) 10:23, 18 November 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Tea tree oil ==
I am the former editor known as "Joe Circus." When I attempted to learn the point of view of my colleagues on the [[circumcision]] page, jayjg personally went on my talk page and threatened to block me if I didn't shut up. None of you would accept that kind of bully boy behavior from a colleague, and naturally I fought back, resulting in the current situation. I'm not eating any of jayjg's [removed] just to post on [[circumcision]]. Any objective person who reads the lead will see that he & his cohorts are actively promoting circumcision as a GLOBAL strategy for HIV/AIDS. When an editor, Chevara, posted some research showing the truth of the matter, jayjg promptly called him a "Joe Circus" puppet. The fellow sees "Joe Circus" everywhere in his paranoia that his beliefs are under attack. He & his cohorts are on the wrong side of history. Unfortunately, at this time, so is Wikipedia.
 
[https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19774761/Tea%20tree%20oil%20in%20dermatology.pdf 1], [https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19774761/Melaleuca%20alternifolia.pdf 2] [[User:OhanaUnited|<b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b>]][[User talk:OhanaUnited|<b style="color:green;"><sup>Talk page</sup></b>]] 15:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_assistance&action=edit&section=11 [[Special:Contributions/91.187.121.116|91.187.121.116]] ([[User talk:91.187.121.116|talk]]) 19:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
Thank you for notifying me of the history regarding the past disputes with Jayjg on the circumcision article. This brings more information to light about this situation. I am unclear about the puppet situation with regards to you or Chevara, and can't comment on that without checking the logs myself, which I can not do. We are actively trying to bring more non-partisan editors into the article via neutrality tag so we can reach a conclusion on whether there is a pro-circ bias to the article. Though this tag keeps getting erased by JakeW or Jayjg. I would encourage you to lobby for reinstatement and to stop any behavior prohibited by Wikipedia.[[User:Gsonnenf|Gsonnenf]] ([[User talk:Gsonnenf#top|talk]]) 05:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
:[comment from jayjg removed]] [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 12:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
:: Jayjg, please do not delete comments from my talk page ever again. You have an obvious conflict of interest as we are currently involved in several heated disputes and these comments involve your past beahvior. You deleted these comments without informing me or leaving a place holder. Your deletion violates wiki policy. If you disagree, do not respond on my talk page. Your comments will be removed as they were above. If you wish to continue this, we can do so in a moderated forum. Thank you for your compliance.[[User:Gsonnenf|Gsonnenf]] ([[User talk:Gsonnenf#top|talk]]) 12:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 
Hi,<br>
I agree that it's a gross conflict of interest for an editor to stalk other's talk pages and remove comments. [removed for content]. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.177.170.151|81.177.170.151]] ([[User talk:81.177.170.151|talk]]) 15:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
: A MESSAGE TO IP USERS. Though I value contributions from anonymous users, please try to keep your comments constructive and informative instead of insulting. I have a received a message from an IP users that some of the negative comments are not coming from him. I feel there maybe [[agent provocateurs]] involved in this IP editing.[[User:Gsonnenf|Gsonnenf]] ([[User talk:Gsonnenf#top|talk]]) 21:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692071653 -->
 
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
:: I value all thoughtful comments myself. I've followed this article for over five years. Not once has an editor from the pro-gang been blocked or banned. In that time, about 30 different users (not socks, mind you) who were trying to edit the article in accordance with modern medical findings have all been hounded and bullied off the article. Blackworm, for example, a great editor for many years, finally threw in the towel when he realized that the other side was just playing for time. It's still that way. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/41.35.45.103|41.35.45.103]] ([[User talk:41.35.45.103|talk]]) 00:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::I also suspect this may be a result of agent provocateurs Gsonnenf; these users never surfaced until just a few days ago (let's see if it continues now that we drew attention to it)... [[User:Therewillbefact|Therewillbefact]] ([[User talk:Therewillbefact|talk]]) 01:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Gsonnenf. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
== sources ==
Hi Gsonnenf,
I'm confused. Every time I make an edit in circumcision, I get told that it has to meet a higher standard. The last one I used had been published in www.aidsmap.com. They told me it was a primary source. I found the same article, Sex With Stitches, in PubMed. The PubMed one referenced the one in www.aidsmap.com. That one got yanked, telling me it was still primary research. It needs to be systematically reviewed. All of the locations listed in the Wikipedia entry on Systematic Review are pay sites. Is this something which can't be worked, without a subscription? Thanks, 96.252.103.226.
 
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== [[Anonymous]] ==
 
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Gsonnenf, You've been requested to let your talk page receive posts from [[Anonymous]]. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/201.75.22.112|201.75.22.112]] ([[User talk:201.75.22.112|talk]]) 17:29, 28 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=813406758 -->
 
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==
: I'm fine with receiving messages from IP users as long as they follow wiki rules. Its apparent that many people feel intimidated and may not want to post for fear of retaliation from special interest groups. Thanks. [[User:Gsonnenf|Gsonnenf]] ([[User talk:Gsonnenf#top|talk]]) 21:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
:: Thanks you, Gsonnenf -- Since you edit a wide number of articles, I'd like to emphasize our common interest in promoting human freedom and progress. I don't think anyone but a Tyrant would oppose such a conversation. [[Anonymous]] [[Special:Contributions/41.35.46.131|41.35.46.131]] ([[User talk:41.35.46.131|talk]]) 23:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
 
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
::: It's actually painful to read all their evasions and equivocations. [[Rush Limbaugh]] would be proud of them. [[Anonymous]] [[Special:Contributions/190.90.162.67|190.90.162.67]] ([[User talk:190.90.162.67|talk]]) 22:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
:::: If you have any useful sources and analysis I would be happy to look at them. [[User:Gsonnenf|Gsonnenf]] ([[User talk:Gsonnenf#top|talk]]) 10:46, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=926750323 -->
 
== WQA ==
 
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
Thanks for your comment at [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance#Calling "Jewish" a source or an article improperly and without any valid reason]]. Ordinarily, I would suggest at this point that the discussion simply be closed. However, the user has been directed separately to withdraw his accusation of libel,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACeci_n%27est_pas_une_pipe&diff=480293836&oldid=480287826] for which he should probably be given the opportunity.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 12:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
: Alright, I added the administrators instructions to the WQA. That should hopefully take care of everything that needs taking care of.[[User:Gsonnenf|Gsonnenf]] ([[User talk:Gsonnenf#top|talk]]) 12:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
::I've exercised my right of reply to my accuser. Please close/archive the topic.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 08:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
== Please sign your posts ==
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiquette_assistance&diff=480626105&oldid=480605718] <small>[[User talk:Nobody Ent|Nobody Ent]]</small> 12:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
: I left the optional tag signature blank intentionally. Mathsci might have taken my name up there as an invitation to start another argument. Something that helps no one.[[User:Gsonnenf|Gsonnenf]] ([[User talk:Gsonnenf#top|talk]]) 22:56, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== WQA Archive ==
 
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
I archived the WQA per your suggestion. I also noticed a couple of other edit summaries indicating that the auto archive bot had not been working. I've seen this happen before (see [[User_talk:Jeffro77/Archive2010a#Archive]]). If the current target archive is ''already'' too big to archive the first section of the main page, the bot doesn't correctly advanced to the next page. This usually happens when a manually archived section causes the current archive target to exceed the size specified for the bot. I have incremented the counter, so the archiving bot should start working properly as of tomorrow (depending on your time zone). (I realise that the last edit to the section I archived was not yet old enough for the automatic archiving threshold.)--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 12:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
</td></tr>
 
</table>
== Edit warring on Circumcision ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1056563210 -->
 
Gsonnenf, you seem to return to Wikipedia on an irregular basis almost solely for the purpose of edit-warring on the [[Circumcision]] article, removing anything you view to be too "pro-circumcision". This kind of long-term activism and edit-warring is harmful for Wikipedia, and not at all in keeping with its goals. I'd like to be very clear about this; if you revert the article even once more, I will ensure you are taken to the proper venue for administrative action. Please take this notification seriously. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 18:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 
: Jayjg, your accusations are without merit. Please stop making these baseless accusations and threats. Many see your tactics as some of the most disruptive in Wikipedia. I've asked you before not to comment on my talk page. If you have a problem feel free to seek dispute resolution.[[User:Gsonnenf|Gsonnenf]] ([[User talk:Gsonnenf#top|talk]]) 02:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 
== Dispute resolution for Circumcision ==
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Circumcision". Thank you [[User:Tftobin|Tftobin]] ([[User talk:Tftobin|talk]]) 12:54, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 
== Removed ==
 
[[Removed]] [[Special:Contributions/41.219.160.203|41.219.160.203]] ([[User talk:41.219.160.203|talk]]) 16:01, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 
Hello, I had previously received an email from some banned contributors stating they were not posting these vulgar anonymous statements. They believed an agent provocateur is trying to disrupt the credibility of their cause by posting malicious and inappropriate messages under their guise.[[User:Gsonnenf|Gsonnenf]] ([[User talk:Gsonnenf#top|talk]]) 18:25, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 
== Let People Censor Their Own User Pages, Champ ==
 
Jakew, I agree with you here. Zad68 19:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 
So we have a new [[Circumcision]] [[Boss]]. The [[torch]] has been passed to the next generation. Someone new to chuckle at the little one's [[pain]]. [[Iconoclast]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/177.43.161.218|177.43.161.218]] ([[User talk:177.43.161.218|talk]]) 17:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Invitation for comment ==
 
As the subject seems to be of your interest, and you are an experienced editor, would be appreciated your opinion in this, as yet, non-consensual and '''critical''' [[Talk:Ethereal_beings#Label|talk]]. Thanks, [[User:Excalibursword|Excalibursword]] ([[User talk:Excalibursword|talk]]) 17:44, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy