:Yes {{u|Firefly}}, but then, this is not, perhaps, a run-of-the-mill filing, is it? In any case, as a number of points have been made since I last looked in, and in at least one case, I would like to make a follow-on point cogently and coherently. Many thanks. Also, re. {{tq|If it is just to bring what you already have posted "within the rules"...}}: Barkeep49 already advised against that, and, rare though it ''may'' seem, I do actually read and take heed of what they say :) so, no, it's not for just gussifiying. [[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:blue">——Serial</span>]] 19:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

*{{reply|Robert McClenon}} re: {{tq|That raises questions about Fram's judgment that may reflect on suitability to be an administrator... [and] the reliability and suitability of Fram as an administrator}}. He's not an admin, unfortunately, and has not been ever since the case you refer to. Your recommendations to the committee may need recalibration in that light. [[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:blue">——Serial</span>]] 12:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

 

=== Statement by Usedtobecool ===