Content deleted Content added
Line 152:
*:Per the conversation at [[WP:RS/N]] the actual policy you're looking for is [[WP:EXPERTSPS]]. [[User:Simonm223|Simonm223]] ([[User talk:Simonm223|talk]]) 18:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
*::Right, and he needs to be qualified as an expert in the relevant field for which he's cited. Saying he was employed as a "journalist" is as vague as calling someone a "scientist" -journalist of what? There are science journalists, art & culture, crime reporters, sports reporters. Obviously we don't want to cite a sports journalist here, even though an art-based website is currently being used in an attempt to substantiate Klippenstein in this article. Is Klippenstein a counterterrorism expert? No. An ethicist? No. A crime reporter? No. A health economist? No.[[User:Jonathan f1|Jonathan f1]] ([[User talk:Jonathan f1|talk]]) 20:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
*:::According to [[Ken Klippenstein]], he's a FOIA document expert. [[User:Kire1975|Kire1975]] ([[User talk:Kire1975|talk]]) 01:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
== Why does the name of [PRIVACY] not occur in this article? ==
|