Content deleted Content added
Line 193:
:::::::The reason why Ken objects to how the media's reacted to Mangione's sympathizers, and the NYPD's labeling of Mangione sympathizers as "extremists," is because most, if not all, of his readers fall under this category. Which is also why we cannot have a full section with just his opinion, assuming you even believe he's a reliable source by himself (which I don't). [[User:Jonathan f1|Jonathan f1]] ([[User talk:Jonathan f1|talk]]) 17:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::We get it. You don't like Klippenstein as a source. Your objection has been noted. How about you let it rest unless you have something new to say. [[User:Simonm223|Simonm223]] ([[User talk:Simonm223|talk]]) 17:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::That's enough. I've not seen any arguments he's somehow reliable, either - and no, writing for ''The Intercept'' doesn't count. His substance is an [[WP:SPS]], his own writings aren't independently noteworthy, and his personal opinions on the media (shocker - as an independent writer who formerly wrote for counter-cultural left-wing websites, he doesn't like the mainstream media) aren't noteworthy at all. We shouldn't include them. '''[[User:Toa Nidhiki05|<i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Toa</i>]] [[User talk:Toa Nidhiki05|<i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Nidhiki05</i>]]''' 18:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
== Why does the name of [PRIVACY] not occur in this article? ==
| |||