Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Holloway (historian): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 13:
:: It seems a bit of breach of privacy to me in hindsight. How could I get an oversight revision deletion for the fourth revision that I made. [[User:Rig15|Rig15]] ([[User talk:Rig15|talk]]) 14:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
:: I agree with you that editing the revision is the appropriate thing to do, therefore I will delete the proposed deletion of the page[[User:Rig15|Rig15]] ([[User talk:Rig15|talk]]) 15:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' -- Nom gives no valid reason for deletion whatsoever. "This isn't a valid deletion nomination," as {{u|TheGracefulSlick}} is wont to say. The sources already in the article demonstrate dispositively that subject meets GNG. [[Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52]] ([[User talk:192.160.216.52|talk]]) 14:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
| |||