User talk:ST47/Archive8
| This is an archive of discussions past. Please do not edit this page, and instead visit User talk:ST47 if you want to leave me a comment. |
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ST47. |
 |
Contents
EBotHi there! E (t c)'s page says you're handling his bots while he's away. I'm cleaning up WP:ABUSE, and I noticed that there's some error in what EBot posts to the Wikipedia:Abuse reports/Actioned page. Could you take a look at it, and let me know if it's something I'm doing wrong with the template, or if it's the bot? Thanks! --Darkwind (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I also notice that there is garbage in the reject summaries produced by EBot at Wikipedia:Abuse_reports/Rejected. Is this related? --Jjamison 20:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello ST47! I wrote an article on UK indie label Alex Tronic Records recently, but it was deleted with the reasons (spam, notability) given. I ensured that the notability of the article was verified throughout, e.g. including links and notes to major uk published magazines mentioning and backing up the quotes used. This was not intended as a spam article in any way. Please can you undelete the article and highlight what changes are necessary, I'll be happy to fix the article. The url for the record company is on www.alextronicrecords.co.uk if you need to check anything. Thanks! Whodis7 15:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
No probs! thanks very much. Whodis7 20:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC) The Interwikilink to Indonesian on this page done by STBOT is doubtful. Pls check for contence and, in case, delete. --172.176.193.102 18:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC) (i. e. de:Benutzer:Marinebanker)
Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 05:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Arden Wohl Afd debateI'm not sure if this is appropriate by Wikipedia standards, but you might want to protect the Afd debate page now that it's finished. Tweety21 (who goes by various IP aliases) has a long history of vandalizing anything that he/she disagrees with. Just a thought. Thanks. Ward3001 20:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete?Dharmic religion... seems that there were enough comments to warrant a merge/redirect. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dharmic religion. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Empty talk pagesHi. I have requested two blank pages for speedy deletion. The one, in fact, is a talk page of a redirection article. Why you didn't delete them and just blanked the pages again? -- Magioladitis 20:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Melon (slang) deletionHello, I was just wondering... I created only the slang disambiguation aspect. All that text was previously MISSplaced on the Melon (fruit) page, where it definitely DID NOT belong :O. So I simply moved it to it's own page... I didn't write that content, so I can not vouch for it's validity, but still I can imagine it does deserve a slang context...?--Tallard 21:52, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the decision to delete dharmic religionI think that this was a very good decision (disambiguation or redirect would have been possible too) because there are no reliable sources for this supposedly scholarly phrase. Andries 22:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC) Archdiocese of MiamiIn the interest of giving Wikipedia a chance to abide by its own policies, I have removed my threat to send this issue to the Catholic League. Please consider that there are millions of parishioners like me living in the Archdiocese of Miami who feel the same way and they are not Wikipedia editors who will be banned if they report this obvious violation of Wikipolicy that causes real harm to real, innocent priests and children.NancyHeise 19:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Unwanted attention!You appear to be receiving it! Both Commons and Meta pages were vandalised today - let me know if you want any form of page protection on either - cheers --Herby talk thyme 12:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC) Good Thinking!Thanks for getting your STBot to fix the small tag error that was caused by the delivery bot!¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I have included a fair use rationale. If you still don't think it is detailed enough, let me know on my talk page. Thank-you. ~ Troy 02:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC) IP abuseHi there, I'm asking this as you're someone I recognise who is on the WP:ABUSE page. The page there says don't report unless an IP has been blocked 5 times. However, this particular miscreant is proudly exclaiming that he can't be caught as he's on dynamic IP and can change his IP at will. The result is that no single IP address has been blocked 5 times. However, as you and I know, he *is* trackable as he'll be logged in to his ISP. I'm going to start gathering the evidence anyway, but would appreciate knowing what to do with it once I have it. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 16:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
blocked or not blocked ?Hi, what happened ? user has no blocked message , but you removed them from Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism?
Cheers. Mion 21:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Regarding File:SNCS logo.gifYou deleted the logo stating I6. I have uploaded a low res version of the deleted logo @ Image:SNCS_logo.JPG, along with a fair use rationale, I hope it is OK. Mð¥ðñK Ãßhï§h€K 06:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC) ProteinBoxBot approvalAs one of the two BAG members who commented on the ProteinBoxBot during its trial period, I wonder if you'd chime in on the full approval request? Cheers, AndrewGNF 17:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Main Page unprotected imageWhen you put a Commons image on the Main Page, you need to make sure it is protected, either by uploading it here and allowing cascading protection to protect it, or by asking for protection at Commons. Image:Mozart drawing Doris Stock 1789.jpg was unprotected when you put it on the Main Page. --- RockMFR 19:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to #ed --NeoLobster 23:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
"Thank you for uploading Image:Gräf&Stift DD-2FU.JPG."Hi. "Thank you for uploading Image:Gräf&Stift DD-2FU.JPG," your bot says, so you should really get it fixed. Best wishes, <KF> 19:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC) questionCould you delete the redirects? H2O 22:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
ProtectionHi ST47, I have protected your userpage (and if the vandal does not stop soon, I will have to do the same with your user talk page. You seem to have an IP-rotating 'fan' ... --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
User:BetacommandBot -- Scope of approval?Hello, I'm writing regarding this bot RfA which you approved. User:BetacommandBot has been continuously tagging images for deletion which have fair use rationales but do not contain links to articles in which they are used. The issue has been brought to WP:AN here. The bot has been blocked and unblocked, and the issue is rather heated. Please comment on whether the behavior was within the scope of your approval (or more generally whether it is appropriate by your judgment). — xDanielx T/C 09:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC) TfD nomination of Template:Deletable image2Template:Deletable image2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. →AzaToth 13:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC) StatsHello. Because you update / maintain WP:ADMINSTATS, I was wondering if you had any type of magic that would be able to updated Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits. Currently, the system used involves downloading the enormous enwiki-stub-meta-history file and using Perl to pull out the appropriate data, though there must be a better way. Would you be able / willing to update the list? Cheers. --MZMcBride 19:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure what happened to this category but it's still redlinked from [1] you might want to fix that. Kappa 01:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Block lengthSo, the guy is obviously jumping from IP to IP. Could you perhaps lower the block lengths to avoid excessive collateral damage for anyone that inherits the IPs? EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
List of editors by edit countA few things. First, how did you generate the most recent list? I'm curious. If you used a better method than what is listed on the top of Wikipedia talk:List of Wikipedians by number of edits, then please update the instructions to correspond to this better method. Next, please read Wikipedia talk:List of Wikipedians by number of edits#Mikkalai name removals. The consensus is that editors should be allowed to "unsubscribe" from the list, or at least replace their names with a placeholder; in the future, we will replace the names of editors on this list with a placeholder before uploading a new list, in order to avoid the (seemingly) inevitable edit war. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 22:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Unicode and bot malfunctionsSince STBotI is persisting in creating image description pages at nonsense titles whenever it encounters a non-ASCII image name, I've modified OrphanBot to notify you whenever it finds one of them. --Carnildo 19:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC) In response to...In response to your message on my talkpage, fair point, however, I only reverted his page twice, what he is doing, is deleting my comments, and when I make a reply, calling them reverts, and threatening me with a block, what is your opinion on this? Meateater 10:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
umWhy did the bot remove the welcome? See [2] Thanks! Phgao 19:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:ST47/EditCountUser:ST47/EditCount, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ST47/EditCount and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:ST47/EditCount during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Melsaran (talk) 14:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Please unprotect this page; the protection was clearly out-of-process as you fully protected it while no vandalism had occurred yet, and I want to remove my name from the list. Melsaran (talk) 18:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Standard userfication requestPer WP:PROD, I am entitled to make a reasonable request for the restoration of any material deleted without due process. I now ask you to restore Evil lair, a universally known concept and a basic shtick of several kinds of fiction, into my userspace with full page history so that I may review the reasons behind the proposal and examine the article for salvageable content, per our policies and guidelines for inclusion. Apologies for sounding like Gandalf in the hands of a bad fanfic writer. I got into watching the Dungeons & Dragons movie. --Kizor 19:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Opting out?Ahoy. As you know, a small amount of us admins have been opting out from varying WP namespace statistical lists. (For instance, I have removed myself from WP:LA and WP:WBE). Would you be willing to accept requests to opt out of your administrative statistical reports? By no means am I saying "zomg remove me or else!," I'm just wondering if you were open to opt-out requests... --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC) A user you blockedHi, there. Could you please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Blockage and respond there as soon as you can, the user's personal attack aside (it's irrelevant anyway). Thanks. Cowman109Talk 21:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Random IP
Good humour
User:MurinessI've been trying to help him for a while. He wants to include his telecom company. It clearly isn't notable, but he has trouble understanding the rules. I feel that he could potentially be a good editor, if he knew what he was doing. Want to try and help him? ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 20:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
?Thanks for linking me to that, on how many editers talk pages can I leave a similar message?--Moosh88 00:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, we could easily apply WP:WIKILAWYERING to the reverts done by User:Ghirlandajo and User:Dbachmann. There actions would fall under the Abiding by the letter of a policy or guideline while violating its spirit. I'm all about neutrality, but lets enforce the rule on all editors.--Moosh88 01:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC) Could you please talk to User:Dbachmann? For the second time he has reverted many of my recent edits, without any justification. The info I have provided is all sourced, and is from major or well known scholars, I don't understand what he finds wrong with them for him to be acting this way. Please look into this, I really think we need a neutral user to step in and look at the facts.--Moosh88 06:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Major scholars such as Colin Renfrew, Thomas Gamkrelidze, and Vyacheslav Ivanov support what I had posted, are they to be considered "Armenian nationalists"? It is in fact dab who is pushing his views, I have scholars to back up my claims, who does he have?--Moosh88 18:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC) O_oRouge admin! XD CO2 00:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Blocked Tor Exit Node (129.21.60.134)You blocked a Tor node that I recently started, which is perfectly fine and must be the case for Wikipedia to survive. However, I also use this machine for tunneling HTTP traffic at times and would like to be able to edit Wikipedia myself. I was under the impression that one could edit via Tor (or, a Tor IP) if they were logged in (Editing_with_Tor), but even though I log in, I am unable to edit. Can you enlighten me? --dinomite 16:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
MooshHi, ST47. Just curious, why did you delete Moosh88's (or 98, don't remember for sure) message from my talk page? I don't mind, I was just wondering if you know something I don't. Thanks.--TigranTheGreat 22:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
I admit it was spamming, however, It was not "hugely POV", I was and still am looking for help with editors I had mentioned. If you are going to get involved in this, please stay neutral.--Moosh88 18:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Coat of ArmsDO NOT DELETE THE COAT OF ARMS OF MY HOMETOWN EISENACH AGAIN! GERMAN COATS OF ARMS ARE ITSELF IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, IT IS MY LEGAL RIGHT TO SHOW IT. See below for the legal situation. Have it translated by somebody, if you do not understand German. From de: Wappensatzung Zitieren des Wappens: Ohne eine Genehmigung durch die Gemeinde und damit auch nicht durch eine Satzung schützbar besteht das Recht, ein Wappen zu zitieren. Ein darüber hinaus gehendes Gebrauchmachen im Sinne des § 12 BGB ist nur dann gegeben, wenn durch die Verwendung des Wappens im Verkehr der Eindruck entsteht, der Wappenträger habe dem Benutzer ein Recht zur entsprechenden Verwendung gegeben. Ein solcher Fall liegt etwa dann vor, wenn das Wappen zur Ausstattung von Waren oder sonst zur geschäftlichen Kennzeichnung benutzt wird (vgl. dazu Palandt § 12 BGB Rn. 38 zu § 12 BGB und BGHZ 119 a.a.O.: Verwendung des Siegels der Universität (...) auf T-Shirts). Ansätze von Gemeinden, die Nutzung von Wappen für heraldisch-wissenschaftliche Zwecke von einer Genehmigung abhängig zu machen, sind rechtswidrig, da sie ohne eine entsprechende Rechtsgrundlage in das Grundrecht auf Meinungsfreiheit, die freie Berichterstattung und die (historische) Forschung (Art. 5 GG) eingreifen. Regelungen in kommunalen Wappensatzungen, nach denen für die illustrierende, zitierende oder rein abbildende Verwendung des Stadtwappens eine Genehmigung gefordert wird, sind wegen des Grundrechtseingriffs unwirksam und müssen nicht beachtet werden. Kraxler 03:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Bot malfunctionSTBotI appears to have created an image description page for a non-existant image at Image:Jburg.gif --OrphanBot 06:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Deletable image2 templateSuch a large number of people spoke for deletion that it was clear that keeping it in place didn't have consensus. I closed the TFD discussion and moved the template to User:ST47/Deletable_image2. The redirect should be deleted, but I'm going to leave it to make sure you have a chance to update your bot script. — Carl (CBM · talk) 12:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I suggest you review your oppose, as a couple of your points have been explained. · AndonicO Talk 20:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Anon EditsHi ST47, BAGBot is making anon edits again Just FYI Reedy Boy 21:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Patriot Reign cover (Amazon, HC).jpgre: This oververbose clutter your bot left on my talk Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Patriot Reign cover (Amazon, HC).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Your bot is so damn fast, it preceded my addition of a {{db-author}} tag. Furthermore, fair use rationale was given in text, so it's also malfunctioning. I just don't want a copy with Amazons' damn look inside arrow and will have to find another cover image for Patriots Reign. Suggest you fix your bot to exclude book covers, this is ludicrous waste of our time. // FrankB 03:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete this page? Your summary says "Temporary page, too old", what do you mean by it being temporary? I am complaining because this user is now inserting images which have copyright issues on the Icelandic wikipedia and I wanted to be able to link to the discussion on his English talk page. Can you undelete it. Stefán 17:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
User:NewkyErm... did u just happen to be the one who Banned this User aswell? if not do you know who did? cos he was banned after a Sockpuppeteer said hello to him. Turns out the Sockpuppeteer and Newky are 2 different people cos i saw this "Newky" create his account on a School computer, meaning that it would be unlikely for him to be the Sockpuppereer as there are 30 Wiipedians in my school.OsirisV 19:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Since you have toolserver access, can you think of an easy way to generate an updated version of Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts? —Disavian (talk/contribs) 21:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:34, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Logged out toolserver editingI don't know if you saw it, but apparently you/a bot of yours was editing anonymously yesterday: Special:Contributions/145.97.39.143. -- lucasbfr talk (using User:Lucasbfr2) 10:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
CBS EyeHiya! i'm writing to ask why the CBS Eye logo was deleted. It broke no rules, and everyone voted to keep it anyway.... RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 19:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
BotI'm italian wiki user. In it.wiki the users are welcome by bot. I thinked in en.wiki, too. Now I'm looking for other task.--Kaspo 20:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
AWB check list sortingHi. Don't worry about putting the AWB check page in order. It is sorted automatically once a day most of the time. Jogers (talk) 08:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 03, 2007
Automatically delivered by COBot 03:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:True_origin_archive_front_page.jpgHi, just wondering what I'm supposed to do regarding your notice here? I uploaded this screen shot of the True.Origin website front page which I'm going to use on the article I'm creating for True.Origin. It's just like the screen shot at Image:Talk_origins_archive_front_page.jpg. That image seems to be OK, what do I need to do to make this one OK? Thanks for your help! --profg 02:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Please let me know if what I added works. Thanks! --profg 12:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC) DRV for Image:Jamielloyd.jpgAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Image:Jamielloyd.jpg. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jreferee t/c 16:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC) hmm..hello... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aselinusantaravoyage (talk • contribs) 10:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC) STBotI {{non-free reduce}}Hi, I was just wondering, what resolution does your bot use as a cutoff for {{non-free reduce}}? Thanks, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Image:Gloriarv588ms129130.jpgSource information added. --DannyDaWriter 00:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
STBotI bug reportHi. I uploaded Image:La fée carabine (Gallimard).jpg with a FU rationale. Your bot got confused with the name and slapped a di tag on the page Image:La fée carabine (Gallimard).jpg. You might need to debug/improve its Unicode support. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 06:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC) House1090 possible block evasionYou blocked House1090 (talk · contribs) for using Casa1090 (talk · contribs) as a sock puppet. I suggest you check out 66.81.192.77 (talk · contribs) who appeared today exhibiting the same editing pattern on the same articles. KnightLago 01:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
RE image CliffTet.jpgGot yer bot message. This image (an official portrait) by a DOD employee would seem to be in the public domain. What is the problem with a DOD image? I understand that some government agencies employ civilian photographers or print them in published works, but a group portrait of the Secretary of Defense and his staff? I don't think so. RM Gillespie 17:18, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Dumb BotPlease stop your bot from tagging my self-created {attribution} images as "no source". Dragons flight 18:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
question about the botHi there! I do a lot of uploading of university and college logos, and I've found that whenever I upload such an image with the {{logo fur}} template included, your bot invariably tags the image with the "no FUR" stuff. Is there a way to get the bot to recognize the aforementioned template as a valid FUR? Thanks! Esrever 02:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, a bot operated by you suggests that there is a copyright or source problem with this image. The image is dated 1898, made in the U.S. before 1923. The source is provided, and a description. Please let me know what additional information you require on my talk page. Thanks. CApitol3 02:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, any idea why your 'bot sent a message regarding a copyright or source problem? Please reply here on your talk page. CApitol3 12:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Too big?Please do not make edits like this one. The reason for using a higher-resolution image is clearly explained in the fair use rationale. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:33, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Slight foul-up with AccReqBotHey, ST47... I've been working WP:ACC a lot lately, and, I noticed, that this month, AccReqBot hasn't been keeping up with the Completed Requests for October... In fact, the header template for those requests, does not even list October! :) Thanks! SQL(Query Me!) 09:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Bot tagging for sourcesHi there. Your bot, User:STBotI, seems to be tagging images for lack of sources. Is the bot account doing this unsupervised using an algorithm, or are you (the human) checking the image page for sources? There is a related discussion going on here (bottom of that section). If you could add something there, that might be good. Carcharoth 10:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC) STBotI & UTF-8Your bot appears to have a problem with UTF-8. On this tagging, the bot's edit summary correctly shows the name of the image as Inside Predsjednički Dvori.jpg, but the text of the message states Inside PredsjedniÄki Dvori.jpg. The bot also incorrectly tagged Image:Inside PredsjedniÄki Dvori.jpg (creating a new page) vs. the proper Image:Inside Predsjednički Dvori.jpg. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 19:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
The user that used to be Rambutan has contacted me about your overturning the deletion of User talk:Rambutan. As I understand it, if this user does not want any connection between their two accounts, then he is entitled to remove the links. As the page was moved, anyone who had edited the user talk page would now see that in their history as an edit of the moved page. If anyone gets curious then they can search the user rename log; there is also an entry in the block log which notes the connection, so the user is not able to hide their block history. I often see user talk pages put up for speedy deletion, and I remove the speedy tag from them; however this one is an exception. Do you object to my deleting the page? Sam Blacketer 18:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 AHJust so you are aware of what is going on as a contributor 1 AH, I closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 AH since it was out of process. -- Jreferee t/c 20:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC) logo07jpeg.jpgHi I received your message about the image I posted and no copyright information but I created it how do i add the information?
Question awaiting your answerA question re copyright status of an image awaits your attention at User talk:Broadcastinglive. Cheers. Moriori 01:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC) STBotIHi ST47, can you tell us what's your keywords? ThankS!--OsamaK 10:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
help with copyright tagsI need help tagging photos that have been marked —Preceding unsigned comment added by Somdplunge (talk • contribs) 18:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Unblock requestWoprr (talk · contribs) is requesting to be unblocked. He is caught in your proxy block of 91.89.4.107 (talk · contribs · block log) but is saying the tor exit node has been shut down. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
cc-logo-orange_kl.gifHi, I don't know how to prevent this Image from deletion. I am a CoCreate emplayee and the image is free-to-use. Please explain to me how to proceed. --Cad-freak 09:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Page creationYour bot made the following pages for images that don't exist: Please clean up after it. --OrphanBot 09:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC) Nice botJust thought I'd leave some praise for CSDWarnBot. It's a very good and well executed idea. James086Talk | Email 09:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC) CSDWarnBotHi. I was wondering if this edit/notification by your bot is some kind of bug. Presumably notification is supposed to go out to the creators of articles proposed for deletion..? If that is the case, I don't recall ever having created the article. However, the article has already been deleted and so there is no way of knowing, unless one is an administrator. Cheers. --Mal 17:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Accidental HBC AIV helperbot4 removal?FYI, I suspect that HBC AIV helperbot4 may have accidentally removed an entry from Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. However, I am not sure of this. Here is the edit. It appears as if the bot intended to remove Jesse1616 but inadvertently removed an addition entry for 66.76.71.254. But, again I am not sure whether the second entry might have been tagged for removal. --Ben James Ben 01:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
[2007-10-17 00:38:41 UTC] Fetching special IP list... [2007-10-17 00:38:42 UTC] Done, will check again in 10 minutes. [2007-10-17 00:39:20 UTC] rm 'Jesse1616': Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism [2007-10-17 00:46:54 UTC] Fetching instructions... [2007-10-17 00:46:54 UTC] Done, will check again in 30 minutes. [2007-10-17 00:48:43 UTC] Fetching special IP list... [2007-10-17 00:48:43 UTC] Done, will check again in 10 minutes. [2007-10-17 00:58:44 UTC] Fetching special IP list... [2007-10-17 00:58:44 UTC] Done, will check again in 10 minutes. [2007-10-17 01:03:58 UTC] 72.10.107.101 matched 72.10.107.101, marked as: User is in the categories: [[:Category:Shared IP addresses|Shared IP addresses]], [[:Category:Shared IP addresses from educational institutions|Shared IP addresses from educational institutions]]. [2007-10-17 01:06:01 UTC] rm '222.154.226.165': Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism [2007-10-17 01:07:44 UTC] rm 'Turdmuncher': Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
HBC AIV helperbot4 bugWell, I made a mistake removing a WP:UAA report here (I got caught cutting and pasting). When I went to clean up my mistake, HBC AIV helperbot4 had cleaned up the mess for me, but left a rather unusual edit summary. Looking over the source code, I think the problem is with check_page() in that $user (or more specifically $2) is not checked being an empty string. The regular expression used m/(vandal|userlinks)\|\s*(.*?)\s*\}\}/i could result in $2 being an empty string. The empty string is passed to check_user() which fetchs the block log URL with an empty parameter like so: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Ipblocklist&ip= which gets you the entire Block Log, picking up the wrong admin who did the block. Anyways, quirky little bug that I thought you might want to know about. -- Gogo Dodo 05:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Page creationYour bot made the following pages for images that don't exist: Please clean up after it. --OrphanBot 09:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC) WikiProject on closed proxiesHello ST47, Since you expressed interest in being a participant in WikiProject Closed Proxies, I'm notifying you that I have created the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject on closed proxies. We're currently in closed beta; during this time, we'll bring several proxies online and ensure everything is working before accepting applicants. Hope to see you helping the effort! Shadow1 (talk) 21:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC) FYIBAGBot appears to be broken. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Bot approved?How did a bot (Computer) that wants to change jpg to svg get speedy approval? I had several links on my userpage changed, most of them so small that there's no noticeble difference in quality; no one would want to print them at high resolution anyway. So what is the point? All it does, is making the image harder to edit, totally contrary to the general wiki-sentiment of open editability. I'm trying to keep my cool, but needless 'fixes' like that really get me worked up. - Mgm|(talk) 07:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this was a disambiguation page to distinguish between two (2) separate Elm Islands!!! Now I'll have a lot of work to find those two!!! Thanks for nothing. cheers, Peter Horn 18:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Protected scripts spamCould you please stop spamming my talk page with these messages? I guess you're using some kind of a bot. I really think you should've made it to consolidate all the warnings into just one, with the included list of protected scripts.Thank you ∴ AlexSm 00:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Cascading protection of user scriptsHi, Thanks for fixing the security problem of unprotected user scripts. Could you change the protection in the various scripts not to cascade, though? Cascading protection may cause unexpected problems when not needed (especially in scripts, where templates may be included by mistake and not affect the display). Thanks. – rotemliss – Talk 08:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC) National Restaurant Association?I keep getting odd messages from this bot when I upload pictures, saying: National Restaurant Association logo. This logo may not be used to indicate a National Restaurant Association enorsement or recommendation unless explicity expressed by National Restaurant Association representatives. For questions on the use of this logo, please e-mail media@dineout.org. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI 15:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC) This is really odd, as I'm uploading pictures of footballers, which has nothing to do with some "National Restaurant Association"... please sort it out, I do not want to/think it's fair that, I will be blocked from uploading. Andre666 15:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: ProtectionThanks for the update. Wasn't sure what the procedure was, so I just posted the google search jscript to be helpful. Let me know if there are any other issues! Isaac 16:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC) csd notice botYour bot is being discussed (in a non-nasty way) here, and I personally would appreciate your input if you have time. Thanks. --W.marsh 18:08, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Still Dumb BotPlease teach your bot that {{c-uploaded}} and {{Non-free Wikimedia logo}} should be except from your sourcing checks. Dragons flight 19:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
