Contents
- 1 December 12
- 1.1 File:Biglotandsandisk.JPG
- 1.2 File:FILE0024.JPG
- 1.3 File:Internationalsecurity.jpg
- 1.4 File:Hitchhikers Quartet front.jpg
- 1.5 File:Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy ver2 movie poster.jpg
- 1.6 File:Ismail Samani Tajik.jpg
- 1.7 File:TriangleOfPerception.PNG
- 1.8 File:Project path logo.jpg
- 1.9 File:Brisbane Home.JPG
- 1.10 File:Baner (2).jpg
- 1.11 File:My-Idea-logo.jpg
- 1.12 File:RauteMart02.jpg
- 1.13 File:Freedom V.jpg
- 1.14 File:Old Plate.jpg
- 1.15 File:Indiana In God We Trust.JPG
- 1.16 File:Tennessee Tag.jpg
- 1.17 File:GAOLD.jpg
- 1.18 File:Railfantag.jpg
- 1.19 File:Nmballoonsplate00s.png
December 12
edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Biglotandsandisk.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by SD Card Version 2.Wiki.0 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- File:READER.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by SD Card Version 2.Wiki.0 (notify | contribs | uploads)
Orphaned, low-quality pictures not used in any encyclopedic fashion. Second picture may also contain an image of a living individual. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 04:54, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - really low quality, bad idea of using a personal photo for a size comparison, unused. --pabouk (talk) 13:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FILE0024.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by SD Card Version 2.Wiki.0 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Vague filename, orphaned image, and the SanDisk logo looks like it could be trademarked. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Internationalsecurity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shoplifter (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Found a lower resolution image to be used instead Shoplifter (talk) 09:17, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hitchhikers Quartet front.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by JohnDBuell (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Image is not low resolution. Fails NFCC#8, purely decorative. JJ98 (Talk) 09:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy ver2 movie poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Reimelt (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Copyright violation, fails WP:NFC#UUI#6. JJ98 (Talk) 09:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ismail Samani Tajik.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Beh-nam (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Why we need a non-free modern depiction of this ancient historical figure is beyond me. J Milburn (talk) 14:54, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. Obvious delete. Also poor quality and worthless as encyclopedic content. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:14, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TriangleOfPerception.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ancheta Wis (notify | contribs | uploads).
- File:TriangleOfPerceptionExpOnTop.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ancheta Wis (notify | contribs | uploads)
- Unused. Possibly original research—no source is cited to support the concept of "Three Corners of Perception:Genetics,Anthropology,Sociology". —Bkell (talk) 19:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unused, per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Admrboltz (talk) 03:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Project path logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Itemstart (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused logo. —Bkell (talk) 20:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unused. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Brisbane Home.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by MrWat (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Not the users own work since the logo (the lion with the football) are copyrighted to the Brisbane Lions. Bidgee (talk) 20:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this intended to display the home uniform for the Brisbane Lions? ----DanTD (talk) 23:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes but it doesn't mean you can upload a copyrighted image (since the lion isn't a simple design unlike a striped guernsey). This image is technically a derivative work of a copyrighted work. Bidgee (talk) 20:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this intended to display the home uniform for the Brisbane Lions? ----DanTD (talk) 23:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Admrboltz (talk) 03:48, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Baner (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Gwerinwr (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Large, unused advertising banner for Tŷ Siamas, which was removed from the article in 2006 for being too large and spammy. Additionally, the uploader's self-authorship claim is questionable. —Bkell (talk) 20:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Admrboltz (talk) 03:49, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:My-Idea-logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rahulaiwa9 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused logo. The uploader claims to be the copyright holder and to have released this image into the public domain, but it seems to be the logo of Idea Cellular. The uploader has been blocked indefinitely for WP:SPAM. —Bkell (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RauteMart02.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by СЛУЖБА (notify | contribs | uploads).
- This unused image is described as a "Max Raute drawing," and is tagged with {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. This tag is appropriate only if the image was published anonymously or pseudonymously more than 70 years ago, and the author's name was not publicly disclosed in connection with the image within 70 years after publication. No evidence is provided that this image meets these criteria. Additionally, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} tag says that it alone is not sufficient copyright tagging; there is no explanation for why this image should be in the public domain in the United States. A Google search for "Max Raute" yields several results, among which are an entry on The Spanking Art Wiki (yes, there is such a thing) that refers to Mr. Raute in the present tense and a form provided by MaleSpank.net to contact Mr. Raute, suggesting that Mr. Raute is still living and that this drawing may not be 70 years old, though I can't find any actual dates. —Bkell (talk) 21:22, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The one on MaleSpank.net is surely just a follower of the original Max Raute. The original Max Raute died long ago. He drew this one in the 1930s. I'm not at all whiz at these copyright things. Put whichever you think appliciable or if you can't do it, tell me which one to put. I'm also upsent that the file is being unused now. I put it into the "School corporal punishment" article, but I see it has been deleted from there... СЛУЖБА (talk) 20:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All of this aside, it's a low quality unused image. The questionable tag is only one more reason to delete this. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Freedom V.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dr guywalker (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused photo of a speaker; no context provided for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 21:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons as an image of electronic equipment. The image appears to be for some potential article on stereo equipment. ----DanTD (talk) 23:29, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Don't Move to Commons Unused image with no description. If this had a description of what it was, commons might have use of it. However they will have just as little of an idea as to what to do with this as we do. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:13, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Old Plate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by RSprings123 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- "Nick ???" and his Geocities homepage are not the copyright holders or licensors for this Wyoming state license plate. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 23:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Indiana In God We Trust.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rhatsa26WB (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unless Rhasta26WB (talk · contribs) represents the state of Indiana, this user cannot license that state's copyrighted license plate under either the GFDL or Creative Commons. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 23:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tennessee Tag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by TVSRR (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unless TVSRR (talk · contribs) represents the copyright interests of Tennessee, this user cannot claim to release the state's copyrights into the public domain. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 23:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a current issue Tennessee license plate that is now inactive since the car it was on was traded in for another car (I used to have problems like this with User:Spotteddogsdotorg when it came to stuff like this and how can a license plate be copyright even if it is on a car) TVSRR (talk) 17:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The design belongs to the state of Tennessee; just because it adorns a license plate issued to you by the government of Tennessee doesn't mean they've relinquished their copyrights to that design. Issuance of copyrights is automatic, and I don't find anything to the contrary at the pertinent Tennessee government website. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 03:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a current issue Tennessee license plate that is now inactive since the car it was on was traded in for another car (I used to have problems like this with User:Spotteddogsdotorg when it came to stuff like this and how can a license plate be copyright even if it is on a car) TVSRR (talk) 17:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless TVSRR (talk · contribs) represents the copyright interests of Georgia, this user cannot claim to release the state's copyrights into the public domain. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 23:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a previous issue Georgia license plate that is now inactive since the car it was on was traded in for another car (I used to have problems like this with User:Spotteddogsdotorg when it came to stuff like this and how can a license plate be copyright even if it is on a car) TVSRR (talk) 17:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The design belongs to the state of Georgia; just because it adorns a license plate issued to you by the government of Georgia doesn't mean they've relinquished their copyrights to that design. Issuance of copyrights is automatic, and though the plate appears to be discontinued, copyrights persist until 70 years after the copyright holder's death (see United States copyright law#Duration of copyright). — pd_THOR | =/\= | 03:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a previous issue Georgia license plate that is now inactive since the car it was on was traded in for another car (I used to have problems like this with User:Spotteddogsdotorg when it came to stuff like this and how can a license plate be copyright even if it is on a car) TVSRR (talk) 17:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Railfantag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by TVSRR (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unless TVSRR (talk · contribs) represents the copyright interests of Georgia, this user cannot claim to relicense the state's copyrights into the GFDL. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 23:45, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a current issue Georgia license plate that is now inactive since the car it was on was given a new plate number (I used to have problems like this with User:Spotteddogsdotorg when it came to stuff like this and how can a license plate be copyright even if it is on a car) TVSRR (talk) 17:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The design belongs to the state of Georgia; just because it adorns a license plate issued to you by the government of Georgia doesn't mean they've relinquished their copyrights to that design. Issuance of copyrights is automatic, and I don't find anything to the contrary at the pertinent Georgia government website. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 03:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a current issue Georgia license plate that is now inactive since the car it was on was given a new plate number (I used to have problems like this with User:Spotteddogsdotorg when it came to stuff like this and how can a license plate be copyright even if it is on a car) TVSRR (talk) 17:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nmballoonsplate00s.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wlaursen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Wlaursen (talk · contribs) claimed public domain, citing www.newmexico.gov for the source. The latter only states, "Copyright 2006 State of New Mexico" with no evidence of releasing any copyrights to their otherwise automatically copyrighted license plate. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 23:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - There's something wrong when we can't display license plates in articles to show those outside of the states we live what they look like! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanTD (talk • contribs) 13:17, 13 December 2010
- Crap! I thought I signed this. ----DanTD (talk) 15:48, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You can keep the non-free image in the article as long as you add reliably sourced commentary about the design itself in an article. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 16:22, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.