User talk:Retiono Virginian

Notice: This talk page has only a maximum capicity of 20 dicussions. Once the limit reaches 20. The first ten dicussions will be sent to an archive.

you can find all my archives and past dicussions, in here.

User talk:Retiono Virginian/The archive center.

Not nonsense

Noobscape as an attack is not nonsense, Noob is a disparaging remark, and the article is directing towards Runescape implying all who play it are noobs. The Kinslayer 19:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Retiono Virginian,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have 192 mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Please note that I said 190 mainspace edits please see this for your edit count as I post this you have 192 mainspace and 489 total edits the creator of vandalproof requires 250 mainspace edits. I am being fair. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

A little late...

It is only mainspace edits. You have 202 now. (Click here) and look under main to see. I run into the same problem. I only have 120. I forgot my previous username and email adress :( that had 560 edits so I have to work up to that. Another thing that you might want to look into after you have 500 edits is the auto wiki browser. So on behalf of us low edit people that's why. RED skunk^TALK

03:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

RFA

Well the reason why I'm not applying for an RFA for a few months is because many of my edits are in user talk, I only have about 1,700 mainspace edits and I want to wait until the right time as I've previously had a failed RFA so I don't want it to look like I'm desperate, I'd prefer to wait until I think its the right time - Thanks for your comments.Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 17:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Re : Help

Noted, warned editor in question again. Will monitor and see if futher follow-up action is required. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 16:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

RE:Everything is fine. The user seems to have took a hint and stopped vandalising. Retiono Virginian 16:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

• Yup, noted his indef block. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 14:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

WinLIKE Deletion

Please help to prevent WinLIKE deletion. Thanks for your past voting!
Here is the link: WinLIKE Deletion (84.185.211.19 14:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC))

You may wish to comment on the article's deletion review. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiCartoon

I suppose it could work but I'm not good with MX-Flash and other animation creators so you may have to do it or get somebody to do it for you but you can ask me any questions on my talk page if you wish --Thanks!!Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 15:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Well if you are serious, I would sugegst explaining to Durova that you are not a vandal/troll or any other type of trouble-maker and that you are not trying to make an joke of wikipedia and improve it. I'm sure he/she will understand if you remain civil and friendly.Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 13:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

• Well If you are serious I'd ask permission first to make sure it's sticking to the rules.Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 13:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Durova's comment wasn't an insult to you. It was saying that it'd be a bad idea to make a cartoon that recognizes the vandals per WP:DENY. She wasn't calling you a vandal or something like that. Metros232 13:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

New template

I speedy deleted your new speedy deletion template, {{Db-hoax}}. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion, specifically WP:CSD#G1. Hoaxes are among the things listed as non-speedyable. Metros232 13:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Argh

You are the second person to ignore what i have said(no offense), and TRUST ME, He Knows. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 17:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

See my report on him here> User:R9tgokunks\User:LUCPOL. It gives other links to other conversations as well as this : Portal_talk:Poland/Poland-related_Wikipedia_notice_board#Voivodeships_1921-1939 -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Well i just noticed he is up to stalking me again... User_talk:Appleseed#Appreciation, and do you really think so? He seems to be trying to atone for his mistakes, but I am not sure if its genuine. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Apparently he is making personal attacks at me, i think(i do not know what hes trying to get at?) I do not know what this is supposed to mean. See User_talk:R9tgokunks&redirect=no#You_want_war.3F. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey, could you check my page history and my user page.......it seems hes a little angry... -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Now he is adding "sockpuppet:r9tgokunks" tags to seemingly random IPs. I wonder if he knows of "checkuser" at all. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Why?

Why? LUCPOL 18:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)