User talk:^DevelopAll

Image copyright problem with Image:Diaton_Tonometer_eyelid_iop_test.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Diaton_Tonometer_eyelid_iop_test.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Tonometer/Tonometry

Dear AED, please do not take my actions personally, but the previous version of the update was creating a negative "suggested" opinion about Diaton; where the opinion was based on TGDc and not Diaton (fyi TGDc is no longer in production). As you have also correctly noticed, "powered by" - we have added Diaton Tonometry as an educational vehicle to Wikipedia just a few days ago due to the FDA approval - it's a new, unique method, which I hope will do much good to the industry and the cause overall. No spamming was intended and would like to request to reinstate the link as external source for information purposes – the link did not lead to the buy page, just presented legitimate overview… I also wanted to take a moment to thank you for taking your time to review all the available info as deep as you have; even I haven’t done as much as you have. There are a number of fresh publications, with up-to-date information about Diaton entering wide media within this and the following months. I will try to make you aware as it appears and would like to jointly, since we're educating the same marketplace, to create awareness of this new tonometry method. Looking forward… ^DA

Is there a particular reason that you keep deleting good information about the negative aspects of the Diaton tonometer from Tonometer and Tonometry? -AED 20:03, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

RE: from ^DevelopAll

Um, hello. You left a message on my talk page; something about a Diaton tonometer. Anyway, I think you might have the wrong user. Kimu 05:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I'm not presenting anything at ARVO this year, so won't be there, sorry. but I enjoyed your abstract. I wish you luck with your new tonometer but would suggest that 1) the device needs to be disinfected between patients to reduce cross contamination of patients with blepharitis, 2) limitations of the device need to be clearly stated to maintain credibility and 3) reference should be made to other research which has highlighted the difficulty of obtaining transcleral (let alone transpalebral) tonometer readings. e.g. Kolin T, Wedemeyer LL, Kolin E, Braun Y. Comparison of scleral and corneal Tono-Pen readings. .J AAPOS. 2003;7: 291-292 and Breitfeller JM, Krohn DL. Limbal pneumatonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980; 89: 344-352.