User talk:Amaury

Welcome!

Hello, Amaury, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Lumia Waber, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cadwaladr (talk) 07:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lumia Waber

A tag has been placed on Lumia Waber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Cadwaladr (talk) 07:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Syncsta

Understood. ^^ - Eugene Krabs (talk) 02:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

No problems, the nice thing about wikipedia is there's always someone looking over your shoulder. It's also the annoying thing about wikipedia once in a while, but on the whole it means being bold as you were is the right thing to do. Happy editing! --fvw* 02:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I know. Every one click I do on "Recent changes" I see a whole new page of edits... whereas with other wikis like PSUPedia only one or two edits are made when I click "Recent chnages" unless they're updating several articles, which only lasts for a minute or so. XD - Eugene Krabs (talk) 02:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Sacrament (album), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cannibaloki 02:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

"Vandalism"

Please refrain from wantonly reverting any edits that are deletions and calling them vandalism. You reverted an edit of mine, one which deleted redlinks and blatant vandalism on St. Peter, Minnesota, and you also deleted constructive work on Patrick Stump while another user was still working on it. We appreciate your enthusiasm in vandal-fighting, but again, please look closer before reverting.Iulus Ascanius (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I understand. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)