User talk:Garethfloydmorgan: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Slatersteven (talk | contribs) |
→NPA: Reply |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It does not matter if we have read your work or not, we do not get to judge its veracity, other RS do (you have been told did), you need to follow out policies (you have been told this, already), and yo need to treat other users with respect (see [[wp:civilty]]). [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 13:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
It does not matter if we have read your work or not, we do not get to judge its veracity, other RS do (you have been told did), you need to follow out policies (you have been told this, already), and yo need to treat other users with respect (see [[wp:civilty]]). [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 13:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
||
:Does that apply to you, or are you allowed to insult me and threaten me? |
|||
:Please tell me which policies I am failing to follow by simply asking repeatedly if there is anyone there who is willing to read the paper in order to gauge if the new evidence is significant or not. |
|||
:If you don't want to answer my simple question just say so. I would happily go to arbitration if it helps. |
|||
:How about if I just edit the AAT page, correcting all the misinformation? I was trying to be discrete, but I can do that if you prefer. [[User:Garethfloydmorgan|Garethfloydmorgan]] ([[User talk:Garethfloydmorgan#top|talk]]) 14:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:09, 23 October 2024
NPA
This will be my last warning, next time I will report you.
It does not matter if we have read your work or not, we do not get to judge its veracity, other RS do (you have been told did), you need to follow out policies (you have been told this, already), and yo need to treat other users with respect (see wp:civilty). Slatersteven (talk) 13:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Does that apply to you, or are you allowed to insult me and threaten me?
- Please tell me which policies I am failing to follow by simply asking repeatedly if there is anyone there who is willing to read the paper in order to gauge if the new evidence is significant or not.
- If you don't want to answer my simple question just say so. I would happily go to arbitration if it helps.
- How about if I just edit the AAT page, correcting all the misinformation? I was trying to be discrete, but I can do that if you prefer. Garethfloydmorgan (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)