Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalom Dov Wolpo

Shalom Dov Wolpo

Shalom Dov Wolpo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

WP:BIO, his books seem to be self published, I don't think that he qualifies for an article yet. PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 12:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. WP:BIO, his books seem to be self published, I don't think that he qualifies for an article yet. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 12:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC) As there were significant changes and additions of sources to this article, [1], I withdraw my delete vote. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• Please note that PinchasC is nominating this article for deletion because he is a Chabad anti-messianist, and he wants to keep all material about chabad messianists out of wikipeida. This guy is the originator of Chabad messianism which is why he (a) he is 100% notable and (b) PinchasC wants this article deleted.m Also note that his books have been discussed in numerous scholarly books and journals as they represented a paradigm shift in Chabad thinking. David Spart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) 13:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

The above is not true, I don't have the time to get into a petty argument now as to the conspiracy theories of why I nominated this article. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 13:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Right, so why have you nominated an article for deletion (part of a patern) which has numerous not-trivial sources, and when you know full well that the man is very very notable? David Spart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) 13:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep The man is very very notable within the Haredi, and Israeli political world - indeed this article is largely a translation of the Israeli article on this man - which has much more material. He is regularly mentioned in the Hebrew press, and even the international press for example here, here, here,here, here, here, here and many many more. I think that amply demonstrated that this man is notable by any wikipedia standard. David Spart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) 13:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO --Oskar 13:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Weak Keep Looking at it again, I change to Weak Keep. --Oskar 17:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 15:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep multiple verifiable sources. Catchpole 18:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep If the article is factually correct (and there are sources cited), then the subject is notable. YechielMan 18:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above. More than enough reliable sources presented to establish WP:V and meet WP:BIO. --Shirahadasha 20:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per everyone else. Acalamari 23:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per bountiful sources added that establish notability. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 04:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep While his sources are self- published, they are nevertheless the main sources of messianic Chabad, they are quoted by other, friends and foes of Chabad, as the primary texts on the topic.--Jayrav 17:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep this notable Israeli Chabad rabbi (sorry, even a supposed meshichist can have his day in court.) IZAK 08:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)