Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Mastering

Art Mastering

Vanity/Non-notability. Article is almost for sure created by the company founder, given the page history and the other contributions of Voy7 and 66.214.253.155 (inserting links to website). The author claims that the company mastered a hit song/cd and therefore belongs on Wikipedia. A search on Google for \"Art mastering\" gives the company webpage and a few mentionings on forums and the competing company audioplexus (links to which the author has vigorously replaced by own links in Audio mastering). Han-Kwang 18:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

• \'\'\'Delete\'\'\' As someone who creates music, this article makes very little sense to me. For example, it says that someone doing \"artmastering\" might change the \"\'\'order of movements or instrumental parts\'\'\". Maybe, but if so they\'re not \'\'mastering\'\', they\'re \'\'arranging\'\', which is a whole different step in the recording process. Also, I don\'t recall ever reading about \"artmastering\" in any professional musicians\' magazine, not even when they have whole articles about the mastering process. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • The text states that changing the \"..order of movements or instrumental parts..\" is done only in some extreme cases. I think you will agree, that changing the order of tracks, or cutting off and fading out a section of a radio mix to fit it into a prescribed time slot, are tasks commonly performed in mastering studios. So I see no issue, if in some extreme cases, the artist wishes to change an order of movements. As far as calling it \"arranging\", you are right, it definitely goes beyond the regualar mastering, that is probably why they called it \"armastering\" because it involves artistic decisions.

• \'\'\'Keep\'\'\' Do a websearch under \"artmastering\" see what you will find. \"Maniac\" and its subsequent remixes were big hits in the US. Another article on one of the leading music sites MusicBizAcademy.com features Art Sayecki and Artmastering and mentions Michael Sembello and \"Maniac\" http://www.musicbizacademy.com/articles/gman_mastering.htm . I also found a testimonial of Michael Sembello, the author of \"Maniac\", on www.artmastering.com website. So start listening to music, Hankwang , and start reading about it before you attempt to edtit anything associated with Audio Mastering. R. Watts
  • If I do a search for \"artmastering\" as you suggest, I get 19 unique Google hits, most of which seem to be links to the same site. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Search under \"art mastering\" (two words). This link comes up www.musicbizacademy.com/articles/gman_mastering.htm dated Jan 2004. It\'s an editorial article featuring several top mastering studios. Then the same article was re-printed by 8 different music websites for last 3 years.

http://www.allmusicproject.com/GMan/Mastering_GMan.html

http://thabocks.com/music/arcorner/masteringyourmusic.html

http://www.goodnightkiss.com/mastering.html

http://www.indieguitarists.com/gmanarticlemastering.htm

http://www.digidogs.com/shop/product_info.php?products_id=15372

http://electro-music.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4035

http://robertneary.phorumz.com/robertneary-ptopic16.html

http://www.musicbizacademy.com/articles/gman_mastering.htm

This is not a fluke but a well received editorial and deserves to be in wikipedia and artmastering should be in wiki as well. R. Watts

• I don\'t think these websites meet the notability guidelines in WP:CORP, in particular \'\'\"published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations\"\'\'. The editorial (with 8 copies) is written by the G-Man Marketing Company, that specicializes in advertising. Quote from the G-Man website: \'\'\"I once ghostwrote an article for a coalition of companies [...] So I was paid three thousand dollars to state their case.\"\'\' [1] Han-Kwang 21:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

• What a cheap shot Hankwang, you took a sentence out of context from an article in which G-man is speaking against advertising industry. Not even mentioning that the article which you try to diminish is an editorial and features several competing studios so there is no question about credibility http://www.musicbizacademy.com/articles/gman_mastering.htm

Also G-man (Scott-G) writes for National Association of Record Industry Professionals, http://www.narip.com/index.php?page=aboutus .

Additionally, the Musicbizacademy which was the first to published this article meets with ease the criteria of WP:CORP . It is one of the most popular and best established online music publications out there. Do a websearch search for: musicbizacademy . Sorry but sounds like you have no clue on the subject of music.

• I apologize for apparently misunderstanding G-Man\'s intentions. But we are talking about an AfD proposal, not about how much I know about music. Han-Kwang 22:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

• No problem, and sorry for my outburst. You are right, the matter should be discussed and you have evry right to question the subject and voice your point of view.R. Watts

• \'\'\'Keep\'\'\' The source article from musicbiz academy is legit, The writer (G-Man) is legit, The website that published it is legit. That is already enough.

But also there is a testimonial by Michael Sembello on artmastering.com website specifically mentioning thanking for work on \"Maniac\" and there is a picture of Sembello and Sayecki together in the studio.

Most internet articles vanish after 6 months, while this article is kept on many websites for almost 3 years, so it is obviously meaningful and people read it and therefore is \'\'\'Notable\'\'\'. I have no time to browse through way-back-machine but I\'m sure that if the article stayed for so lon on so many websites, it was much more popular right after it was published.

\'\'\'I checked Hankwang edit history\'\'\' and it looks like he removed some critical information from compact disk CD article. He removed ABBA, Claudio Arrau, and Chopin and other info! His edit was fortunately reverted but I\'m wondering why is he so vigorously atacking articles that seem legit and particularily those related to CD and CD mastering ?