Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auxiliary field: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Auxiliary field: Speedy keep |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 08:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 08:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
* '''Speedy keep''', the nominator does not propose a valid [[WP:DEL-REASON]]. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet. [[User:SailingInABathTub|SailingInABathTub]] ([[User talk:SailingInABathTub|talk]]) 10:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC) |
* '''Speedy keep''', the nominator does not propose a valid [[WP:DEL-REASON]]. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet. [[User:SailingInABathTub|SailingInABathTub]] ([[User talk:SailingInABathTub|talk]]) 10:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' an unsourced dictionary definition. If you are going to argue to keep an article you need to produce at least some sources.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 19:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:37, 13 April 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Auxiliary field (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has been unsourced since Feb 2007. After 15 years, I think a deletion discussion is appropriate. Coin945 (talk) 08:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, the nominator does not propose a valid WP:DEL-REASON. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet. SailingInABathTub (talk) 10:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete an unsourced dictionary definition. If you are going to argue to keep an article you need to produce at least some sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)