7 January 2025

• curprev 12:0312:03, 7 January 2025 Migfab008 talk contribs 29,198 bytes +9 Altered template type. Added magazine. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this tool. Report bugs. | #UCB_Gadget undo

6 January 2025

• curprev 04:3404:34, 6 January 2025 Rhain talk contribs 29,189 bytes −12 Reverted 1 edit by Æ's old account wasn't working (talk): Notwally did not revert you the last time. There's no such thing as "mixed-to-positive"; it's either "mixed" or "positive". As you are aware, there is an ongoing talk discussion about this. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 04:2204:22, 6 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 29,201 bytes +12 User:notwally. Stop this, immediately. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 04:1404:14, 6 January 2025 Rhain talk contribs 29,189 bytes +457 + few more VFX mentions in reviews, ce undo
• curprev 04:1004:10, 6 January 2025 Rhain talk contribs 28,732 bytes −13 Reverted 1 edit by Æ's old account wasn't working (talk): Per talk page consensus. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 04:0904:09, 6 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,745 bytes +13 Undid revision 1267669354 by Notwally (talk) Multiple editors also do not support ''your'' synthesised stance. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 03:5403:54, 6 January 2025 Notwally talk contribs 28,732 bytes −13 please stop restoring this unsourced content that also is not supported by multiple editors in the talk page discussion undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• curprev 00:2600:26, 6 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,745 bytes +6 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 00:2300:23, 6 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,739 bytes +13 Something bad is going to happen to all of us if we don't just shut up here. Something terrible. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

5 January 2025

• curprev 12:3512:35, 5 January 2025 Barry Wom talk contribs m 28,726 bytes −6 m undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 10:4610:46, 5 January 2025 Rhain talk contribs 28,732 bytes +380 Ce aggregators, + preview reactions undo
• curprev 10:1710:17, 5 January 2025 Rhain talk contribs 28,352 bytes −13 Per article prose. undo
• curprev 08:3708:37, 5 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,365 bytes +59 Undid revision 1267479503 by Notwally (talk) Drop it. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 08:1108:11, 5 January 2025 Notwally talk contribs 28,306 bytes −59 Undid revision 1267472758 by Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) where are the sources for this? see WP:V undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 07:3307:33, 5 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,365 bytes −5 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 07:3107:31, 5 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,370 bytes +26 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• curprev 07:2807:28, 5 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,344 bytes +5 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 07:2607:26, 5 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs m 28,339 bytes +59 adding note undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 07:1707:17, 5 January 2025 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,280 bytes +59 Just drop it. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 06:4206:42, 5 January 2025 Notwally talk contribs m 28,221 bytes −10 MOS:SMALL undo
• curprev 06:4006:40, 5 January 2025 Notwally talk contribs 28,231 bytes −59 Removing unsourced content undo

29 December 2024

• curprev 10:3910:39, 29 December 2024 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,290 bytes +13 Undid revision 1265942554 by Notwally (talk) Where is the source for 'mixed'? You have broken 3RR multiple times. This is not necessary. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 10:0810:08, 29 December 2024 Notwally talk contribs 28,277 bytes −13 where is the source for "generally positive"? undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 08:2108:21, 29 December 2024 Di (they-them) talk contribs 28,290 bytes +4 Italics undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 05:1005:10, 29 December 2024 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,286 bytes 0 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 05:0605:06, 29 December 2024 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,286 bytes +12 What's it going to be, eh? undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 04:3604:36, 29 December 2024 47.184.137.10 talk 28,274 bytes 0 →Cast undo
• curprev 04:3404:34, 29 December 2024 47.184.137.10 talk 28,274 bytes −33 copyedit undo
• curprev 02:3202:32, 29 December 2024 Notwally talk contribs 28,307 bytes −13 MC says "mixed or average". What source supports your change? undo
• curprev 01:3301:33, 29 December 2024 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,320 bytes +5 Please don't do that again, notwally. I am tired of your relentless bludgeoning. So, which unsourced statement is it going to be? undo Tag: Visual edit

28 December 2024

• curprev 09:0809:08, 28 December 2024 Notwally talk contribs 28,315 bytes −17 where is this supported (not counting SYNTH based on individual reviews)? RT and MC provide some overview of general consensus, but where is the rest of this coming from? undo Tag: Manual revert

24 December 2024

• curprev 23:3123:31, 24 December 2024 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,332 bytes +17 If all of our viewpoints here are unsourced and indulging in WP:SYNTH, which one of us is correct? undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 19:3919:39, 24 December 2024 Notwally talk contribs 28,315 bytes −112 Æ's old account wasn't working, then comment on the talk page or remove what you think is unsourced, but please do not restore unsupported content when there is no consensus for this change undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 17:3017:30, 24 December 2024 PrimeBOT talk contribs m 28,427 bytes −33 →External links: Task 24: elink template removal following a TFD undo Tags: AWB Reverted
• curprev 05:2105:21, 24 December 2024 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,460 bytes +5 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 00:4000:40, 24 December 2024 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,455 bytes +136 Both your arguments sound like synth, but I agree with this one ever so slightly more. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit

23 December 2024

• curprev 03:1403:14, 23 December 2024 Darx9url talk contribs 28,319 bytes +4 →Development and filming undo Tag: Reverted

21 December 2024

• curprev 15:4115:41, 21 December 2024 SporkBot talk contribs m 28,315 bytes −33 Remove template per TFD outcome undo Tag: Reverted

18 December 2024

• curprev 15:5815:58, 18 December 2024 Notwally talk contribs 28,348 bytes −107 Reverted 1 edit by P Aculeius (talk): It's literally directly in the MOS and also explained by another editor. please stop your tenatious editing "Any summary of the film's critical reception should avoid synthesis, meaning it should reflect an overall consensus explicitly summarized by one or more reliable sources" undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted

17 December 2024

• curprev 23:0723:07, 17 December 2024 P Aculeius talk contribs 28,455 bytes +107 Undid revision 1263652734 by Notwally (talk) No, it's clearly not; you do not need a source to say that other sources say exactly what they do, and what they are quoted saying. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 22:2622:26, 17 December 2024 Notwally talk contribs 28,348 bytes −107 restore prior wording as this text is still SYNTH undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• curprev 15:1015:10, 17 December 2024 P Aculeius talk contribs 28,455 bytes +189 Attempting a summary of reception that doesn't skew positive or negative. undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 15:0515:05, 17 December 2024 Erik talk contribs 28,266 bytes −156 Removed sentence not supported in article body, especially with Metacritic, more fairer than Rotten Tomatoes, indicating majority being mixed reviews undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 14:0514:05, 17 December 2024 P Aculeius talk contribs 28,422 bytes −2 Undid revision 1263563749 by Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) Spacecraft don't just "collide with" planets or moons, like a pair of pool balls. That it's going to crash—be destroyed—is the whole point of the mission. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 10:2210:22, 17 December 2024 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs m 28,424 bytes +2 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 10:2210:22, 17 December 2024 Æ's old account wasn't working talk contribs 28,422 bytes +16 These are positive reviews. What makes you think they are mixed? And can we settle this on Talk? undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit

10 December 2024

• curprev 04:2504:25, 10 December 2024 Tayailo talk contribs 28,406 bytes +2 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

8 December 2024

• curprev 22:3722:37, 8 December 2024 P Aculeius talk contribs 28,404 bytes +56 Undid revision 1261958471 by Notwally (talk) This is literally what the following text says—the sentence is a transition that introduces the cited content! undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 22:0522:05, 8 December 2024 Notwally talk contribs 28,348 bytes −74 Undid revision 1261958167 by P Aculeius (talk) no, this is not supported in the body. use the talk page. you are at 3RR undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 22:0322:03, 8 December 2024 Notwally talk contribs 28,422 bytes −56 →Critical reception: where is the source that directly stated this? undo Tag: Reverted