Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 10
| < January 9 | January 11 > |
|---|
January 10
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: 'kept with license & FUR corrected Skier Dude (talk) 19:57, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Adam Warren Sketchbook.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably copyrighted by Adam Warren. No source for the Creative Commons claim. Stefan2 (talk) 00:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to fair use cover scan attribution Pelzig (talk) 10:50, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Pelzig[reply]
Need to have the original file to which this alert was created for removed so only the small, low res, fair use cover scan remains. Pelzig (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Pelzig[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Web site. No source for the Creative Commons claim. Stefan2 (talk) 00:19, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: 'marked non-free
- File:MaraClara2010.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The revisions with the women are unfree. The revisions without the women look free. Stefan2 (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No source for Creative Commons statement. Stefan2 (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No source for Creative Commons statement. Stefan2 (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:IKPP Four Phases.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No source for Creative Commons statement. Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strange watermark which suggests that it has been taken from somewhere. There is a partially unreadable URL. No EXIF. Stefan2 (talk) 00:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The "GMD" is covering some text. This image had been deleted before, too.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Header eng.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Likely a copyvio from some unidentified book or similar. Stefan2 (talk) 00:28, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agree with Stefan2. Even if not, it should be deleted as unencyclopedic.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep Skier Dude (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Knotweed.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Possible copy of http://ardentinny.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Knotweed.jpg MorganKevinJ(talk) 05:04, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the copy on ardentinny.org must be the copyright violation, not the one here. The image is reproduced widely—61 results on Google Images, but all are at least a year newer than the Wikipedia upload (2007), many of the earlier results credit Wikipedia as the source; this one (here's the page) is from 2010, does explicitly not claim copyright, and like most does not give the metadata on the Wikipedia version. —innotata 00:32, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This file was uploaded in 2007 and the ardentinny version is 2010.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AXIS cover4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Album cover. Sreejith K (talk) 06:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This nomination should include all the images listed at Karl Ferris, all need a OTRS permission to verify their licenses. If we don't have the articles about the albums, delete them. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Anibook.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- from MS Clip Art Sreejith K (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AquaGame BoxArt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Box art for Aqua video game. Sreejith K (talk) 06:35, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Paremackal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Painting of unknown provenance, from an iconographic tradition, multiple near-identical icons on Google. Almost certainly not the uploader's own work, as claimed. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:08, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mar Chandy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Similar case as above. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:09, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyvio (obvious due to poor resolution) Bulwersator (talk) 09:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The-Jazz-Age-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "This picture is the copyright of the Lordprice Collection and is reproduced on Wikipedia with their permission" + PD-US-not renewed template, no evidence of permission Bulwersator (talk) 09:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If the PD-US-not renewed template is valid then the permission or lack of permission is not relevant. Isn't there somewhere online we can check if the license was renewed? --MGA73 (talk) 08:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Project Gutenberg and Google Books have many of the copyright renewal books. Search for "copyright renewals YYYY" where YYYY is the year of renewal. Renewals are supposed to be made 28 years after the original publication. There is also a search engine for copyright renewal records where you can search for renewal records directly. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TrekTrax Atlanta Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 09:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I am Eric L. Watts. I designed this image, own the image file and have fully released it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericwatts (talk • contribs) 13:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "TrekTrax Atlanta logo created in March 2010 by Avery Draper" Bulwersator (talk) 12:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jaselyn Blanchard 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says "I have her permission" but there is no source of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 10:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PHILSPADA logo1sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No reason listed explaining why this logo would be licensed under a Creative Commons licence. Stefan2 (talk) 10:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Randy Phillips 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No GFDL statement on Youtube as far as I can see. Stefan2 (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The YouTube video from which this still image is sourced is protected by copyright, but the originator has authorized the distribution of this image under a free license. If more information is required, I'd appreciate your guidance. I think I need to have the content creator complete the template at WP:CONSENT and mail that to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Kindly confirm or advise otherwise.Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 14:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Randy Phillips 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No GFDL statement on Youtube as far as I can see. Stefan2 (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See preceding comments re: Randy Phillips 1.jpg Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 21:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Super k in action.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No explanation as to why this would be GFDL+CC-BYSA. Probably qualifies as fair use, though. Stefan2 (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The submission.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I'm not sure where to report things like this. It is obviously non-free, but the fair use statement is incomplete. I'm also doubting that it is really needed for the article in which it is used. Stefan2 (talk) 10:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- from http://menmedia.co.uk/southmanchesterreporter/news/s/527712_50_hospitalised_in_school_chemical_leak -- Common Good (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:M85.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unfree, see http://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/copyright.html (NOAO Conditions of Use) Bulwersator (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Terms are "NOAO/AURA images may not be used to constitute, state or imply the endorsement by NOAO/AURA, the NSF or any NOAO/AURA employee of an individual, commercial product, process, service or activity.". The file is also unused so no need to ask them for a permission. --MGA73 (talk) 08:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep as a US text-logo. Skier Dude (talk) 20:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Telemundo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I think that it should be as fair use rather than PD-textlogo Bulwersator (talk) 19:32, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is just a letter T (trademarked as "T") with a white curve (a shape that is in the public domain), please explain how it does pass the threshold of originality. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this logo should remain a PD-textlogo image. Fails the threshold of originality; should be treated as public domain. - Seth Allen (discussion/contributions) 04:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- When deciding whether something is a PD-textlogo or not, it is necessary to know the country of origin since the threshold differs from country to country (see commons:COM:TOO). This seems to be a US logo, so I'd guess that it is a PD-textlogo. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bezalel Rakow.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I doubt that this really is own work. Leyo 23:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.