Wikipedia talk:Template index/Cleanup
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Template index/Cleanup page. |
|
|
||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Expand languages
[edit]There is a discussion about whether {{expand language}} is a "cleanup" template and should be included with the {{multiple issues}} wrapper at Template talk:Multiple issues#Expand by language templates. MB 14:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
"Individual message boxes: Issues with style or format" Sub-section
[edit]Why is "Individual message boxes: Issues with style or format" subsection inside "Verifiability and sources" section? Meridiana solare (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- That section appears limited to "style and format" as it applies to source material and how it is cited in the article. I'm not seeing any message boxes related to overall style and format of the prose or the article as a whole. --N8wilson 🔔 19:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, N8. I can see, now. Meridiana solare (talk) 19:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Libel / defamatory
[edit]Is there any way to tag for potentaially libelous or defamatory content?
Eg where the tone is desparaging towards a person or entity or references are selective for those that disparage.
this would fall under WP:BIAS WP:POV but go beyond these Jennpublic (talk) 20:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOT?
[edit]Is there a clean-up tag for possibly veering into WP:NOT territory? I get that we should probably just AFD articles that fail this (though this is also true for notability-fails) but sometimes you'd like to give the people who work on the article a chance. FOARP (talk) 09:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC)