Multiple relation requirements #1992
-
|
Is there a way to require two relational rules? For example, I want to say "immediately before a rule:
precedes:
- pattern: ','
- any:
- kind: string_literal
- kind: char_literal
stopBy:
matches: an-argument |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
This works, but is kind of repetitive (I only have a few "stop at" tokens that are interesting, but if there were a dozen…): rule:
precedes:
any:
- kind: string_literal
follows:
pattern: ','
- kind: char_literal
follows:
pattern: ','
stopBy:
matches: an-argument |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
how about this? rule:
precedes:
any:
- kind: string_literal
- kind: char_literal
follows:
pattern: ','
stopBy:
matches: an-argument |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ah, right I also had the insight to factor out the rule:
precedes:
matches: my-string-literal
follows:
pattern: ','
stopBy:
matches: an-argumentWhich is good because I remembered user-defined literals and raw string literals, so there are two more patterns to match anyways. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
how about this?