Skip to content

[Bug]: possible regression in axis ticks handling in matplotlib 3.6.0rc2 #23806

@neutrinoceros

Description

@neutrinoceros

Bug summary

While running image tests for yt, I noticed a change of behaviour that bisects to
2357c92d87d96d519c8470776e76180e71663d0b (PR #22587)
and that I'm not 100% sure is intentional, where parameters set with Axis.tick_params are forgotten after a call to Axes.cla.

In yt we use persistent Axis instances inside container classes; we typically set some tick_params during instantiation of the container, and defer rendering as much as possible, at which point Axis instances may be cleared before the plot is drawn again.

I think this can easily be fixed in yt, but I wanted to check with you wether this change was intented or not.

Code for reproduction

import matplotlib as mpl
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.tick_params(which="both", axis="both", direction="in", top=True, right=True)
ax.cla()
fig.savefig(f"/tmp/{mpl.__version__}.png")

Actual outcome

3 6 0 dev3625+g25b39d41d3

Expected outcome

with matplotlib 3.5
3 5 0rc2 dev89+g6e95e7bf54

Additional information

No response

Operating system

N/A

Matplotlib Version

3.6 VS 3.5

Matplotlib Backend

MacOSX (but also seeing this on a Linux CI server)

Python version

3.10.4

Jupyter version

N/A

Installation

pip

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      pFad - Phonifier reborn

      Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

      Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


      Alternative Proxies:

      Alternative Proxy

      pFad Proxy

      pFad v3 Proxy

      pFad v4 Proxy