Replies: 3 comments
-
Usually more layers can help if your loss function has plateaued. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
hello,could you please help me reproducing the results presented in the paper about ns ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I think this is a better discussion than issue, since this refers to reproducing research not implemented in this repo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am a Ph.D. candidate conducting research on the prediction of turbulence dynamics using DL models. Currently, I am reproducing the results presented in the paper, but I have a question about the composition of data pairs.
Is it correct that one simulation becomes one input-output pair? In other words, in each case of Table 1 in the paper, is it correct to train one model with N ([0.10] input / (10,T] output) pairs?
I understood that by using 11 time steps in the channel direction and performing lifting-Fourier layers-projection, outputs for T-10 time steps can be obtained at once. However, although I understand the concept of the neural operator, a mapping between infinite-dimensional function spaces, I wonder if it is possible to predict the dynamics of flow fields for dozens of time steps using 11 inputs.
In fact, when I trained the model with the data I have (decaying 2D HIT without forcing), the prediction performance was too poor, which made me question whether I misunderstood the concept.
Thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions