Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits.

anarazel · anarazel · commit 2596d705bdc4 · 2015-10-05T11:53:43.000+02:00
In 020235a I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well. It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even before 020235a. Discussion: 26377.1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
diff --git a/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c b/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
 			RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,
 			ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
 		},
-		-1, 100000000, 2000000000
+		-1, 100000, 2000000000
 	},
 	{
 		{
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
 			RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,
 			ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
 		},
-		-1, 100000000, 2000000000
+		-1, 10000, 2000000000
 	},
 	{
 		{

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =`
`201`	`201`	`RELOPT_KIND_HEAP \| RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,`
`202`	`202`	`ShareUpdateExclusiveLock`
`203`	`203`	`},`
`204`		`- -1, 100000000, 2000000000`
	`204`	`+ -1, 100000, 2000000000`
`205`	`205`	`},`
`206`	`206`	`{`
`207`	`207`	`{`
`@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =`
`210`	`210`	`RELOPT_KIND_HEAP \| RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,`
`211`	`211`	`ShareUpdateExclusiveLock`
`212`	`212`	`},`
`213`		`- -1, 100000000, 2000000000`
	`213`	`+ -1, 10000, 2000000000`
`214`	`214`	`},`
`215`	`215`	`{`
`216`	`216`	`{`