Backpatch missing check_stack_depth() to some recursive functions

akorotkov · akorotkov · commit 98bfb7558a1a · 2024-03-11T02:53:07.000+02:00
Backpatch changes from d57b7cc, 75bcba6 to all supported branches per proposal of Egor Chindyaskin. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DE5FD776-A8CD-4378-BCFA-3BF30F1F6D60%40mail.ru
diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/dependency.c b/src/backend/catalog/dependency.c
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
 #include "commands/sequence.h"
 #include "commands/trigger.h"
 #include "commands/typecmds.h"
+#include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h"
 #include "parser/parsetree.h"
 #include "rewrite/rewriteRemove.h"
@@ -509,6 +510,12 @@ findDependentObjects(const ObjectAddress *object,
 	if (stack_address_present_add_flags(object, objflags, stack))
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow,
+	 * because of the deep dependency tree, not only due to dependency loops.
+	 */
+	check_stack_depth();
+
 	/*
 	 * It's also possible that the target object has already been completely
 	 * processed and put into targetObjects.  If so, again we just add the
diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/heap.c b/src/backend/catalog/heap.c
@@ -595,6 +595,9 @@ CheckAttributeType(const char *attname,
 	char		att_typtype = get_typtype(atttypid);
 	Oid			att_typelem;
 
+	/* since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow */
+	check_stack_depth();
+
 	if (att_typtype == TYPTYPE_PSEUDO)
 	{
 		/*
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
@@ -5941,6 +5941,9 @@ ATExecAddColumn(List **wqueue, AlteredTableInfo *tab, Relation rel,
 	AclResult	aclresult;
 	ObjectAddress address;
 
+	/* since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow */
+	check_stack_depth();
+
 	/* At top level, permission check was done in ATPrepCmd, else do it */
 	if (recursing)
 		ATSimplePermissions(rel, ATT_TABLE | ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE);
@@ -7505,6 +7508,10 @@ ATExecDropColumn(List **wqueue, Relation rel, const char *colName,
 
 	/* Initialize addrs on the first invocation */
 	Assert(!recursing || addrs != NULL);
+
+	/* since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow */
+	check_stack_depth();
+
 	if (!recursing)
 		addrs = new_object_addresses();
 
@@ -9632,6 +9639,9 @@ ATExecAlterConstrRecurse(Constraint *cmdcon, Relation conrel, Relation tgrel,
 	Oid			refrelid;
 	bool		changed = false;
 
+	/* since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow */
+	check_stack_depth();
+
 	currcon = (Form_pg_constraint) GETSTRUCT(contuple);
 	conoid = currcon->oid;
 	refrelid = currcon->confrelid;
@@ -10616,6 +10626,9 @@ ATExecDropConstraint(Relation rel, const char *constrName,
 	bool		is_no_inherit_constraint = false;
 	char		contype;
 
+	/* since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow */
+	check_stack_depth();
+
 	/* At top level, permission check was done in ATPrepCmd, else do it */
 	if (recursing)
 		ATSimplePermissions(rel, ATT_TABLE | ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE);
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c
@@ -2458,6 +2458,10 @@ static Node *
 eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *node,
 							   eval_const_expressions_context *context)
 {
+
+	/* since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow */
+	check_stack_depth();
+
 	if (node == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 	switch (nodeTag(node))
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/jsonpath_exec.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/jsonpath_exec.c
@@ -1160,6 +1160,9 @@ executeBoolItem(JsonPathExecContext *cxt, JsonPathItem *jsp,
 	JsonPathBool res;
 	JsonPathBool res2;
 
+	/* since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow */
+	check_stack_depth();
+
 	if (!canHaveNext && jspHasNext(jsp))
 		elog(ERROR, "boolean jsonpath item cannot have next item");
 

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -595,6 +595,9 @@ CheckAttributeType(const char *attname,`
`595`	`595`	`char att_typtype = get_typtype(atttypid);`
`596`	`596`	`Oid att_typelem;`
`597`	`597`
	`598`	`+ /* since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow */`
	`599`	`+ check_stack_depth();`
	`600`	`+`
`598`	`601`	`if (att_typtype == TYPTYPE_PSEUDO)`
`599`	`602`	`{`
`600`	`603`	`/*`