Fix variable and type name in comment.

hlinnaka · hlinnaka · commit 0a2d07cf1ed8 · 2017-07-12T17:09:04.000+03:00
Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170711.163441.241981736.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c
@@ -586,14 +586,14 @@ StandbyLockTimeoutHandler(void)
  * one transaction on one relation.
  *
  * We keep a single dynamically expandible list of locks in local memory,
- * RelationLockList, so we can keep track of the various entries made by
+ * RecoveryLockList, so we can keep track of the various entries made by
  * the Startup process's virtual xid in the shared lock table.
  *
  * We record the lock against the top-level xid, rather than individual
  * subtransaction xids. This means AccessExclusiveLocks held by aborted
  * subtransactions are not released as early as possible on standbys.
  *
- * List elements use type xl_rel_lock, since the WAL record type exactly
+ * List elements use type xl_standby_lock, since the WAL record type exactly
  * matches the information that we need to keep track of.
  *
  * We use session locks rather than normal locks so we don't need

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -586,14 +586,14 @@ StandbyLockTimeoutHandler(void)`
`586`	`586`	`* one transaction on one relation.`
`587`	`587`	`*`
`588`	`588`	`* We keep a single dynamically expandible list of locks in local memory,`
`589`		`- * RelationLockList, so we can keep track of the various entries made by`
	`589`	`+ * RecoveryLockList, so we can keep track of the various entries made by`
`590`	`590`	`* the Startup process's virtual xid in the shared lock table.`
`591`	`591`	`*`
`592`	`592`	`* We record the lock against the top-level xid, rather than individual`
`593`	`593`	`* subtransaction xids. This means AccessExclusiveLocks held by aborted`
`594`	`594`	`* subtransactions are not released as early as possible on standbys.`
`595`	`595`	`*`
`596`		`- * List elements use type xl_rel_lock, since the WAL record type exactly`
	`596`	`+ * List elements use type xl_standby_lock, since the WAL record type exactly`
`597`	`597`	`* matches the information that we need to keep track of.`
`598`	`598`	`*`
`599`	`599`	`* We use session locks rather than normal locks so we don't need`