Skip to content

Commit 7190220

Browse files
committed
Add C comment that we will have to remove an exclusion constraint check
if we ever implement '<>' index opclasses. Jeff Davis
1 parent 47d6d44 commit 7190220

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

src/backend/executor/execUtils.c

Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
*
99
*
1010
* IDENTIFICATION
11-
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c,v 1.171 2010/02/26 02:00:41 momjian Exp $
11+
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c,v 1.172 2010/05/29 02:32:08 momjian Exp $
1212
*
1313
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1414
*/
@@ -1310,7 +1310,8 @@ check_exclusion_constraint(Relation heap, Relation index, IndexInfo *indexInfo,
13101310

13111311
/*
13121312
* We should have found our tuple in the index, unless we exited the loop
1313-
* early because of conflict. Complain if not.
1313+
* early because of conflict. Complain if not. If we ever implement
1314+
* '<>' index opclasses, this check will fail and will have to be removed.
13141315
*/
13151316
if (!found_self && !conflict)
13161317
ereport(ERROR,

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy