minor #9163 Fixed the types of some options in Collection constraint (javiereguiluz)

javiereguiluz · javiereguiluz · commit 31c0227bd0e9 · 2018-01-29T15:56:04.000+01:00
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch. Discussion ---------- Fixed the types of some options in Collection constraint This fixes the second bug reported in #9116. Commits ------- 6eeb73a Fixed the types of some options in Collection constraint
diff --git a/reference/constraints/Collection.rst b/reference/constraints/Collection.rst
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ error will be returned. If set to ``true``, extra fields are ok.
 extraFieldsMessage
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-**type**: ``boolean`` **default**: ``This field was not expected.``
+**type**: ``string`` **default**: ``This field was not expected.``
 
 The message shown if `allowExtraFields`_ is false and an extra field is
 detected.
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ option are not present in the underlying collection.
 missingFieldsMessage
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-**type**: ``boolean`` **default**: ``This field is missing.``
+**type**: ``string`` **default**: ``This field is missing.``
 
 The message shown if `allowMissingFields`_ is false and one or more fields
 are missing from the underlying collection.
