Enhancement: [consistent-type-assertion] Bring in options from total-functions/no-unsafe-type-assertion #6011
JoshuaKGoldberg
announced in
RFCs
Replies: 1 comment
-
TBH I really hate One big problem is that you can do I think we need to take a look at this rule and really evaluate the point of it and what we might do better. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Before You File a Proposal Please Confirm You Have Done The Following...
My proposal is suitable for this project
Link to the rule's documentation
https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/consistent-type-assertions
Description
https://github.com/danielnixon/eslint-plugin-total-functions#total-functionsno-unsafe-type-assertion has some useful options:
Can we add these options to
@typescript-eslint/consistent-type-assertions
?Fail
Pass
Additional Info
Forking conversation out from danielnixon/eslint-plugin-total-functions#665.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions