Skip to main content

Explainable Needn’t Be (Much) Less Accurate: Evaluating an Explainable AI Dashboard for Energy Forecasting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations. AIAI 2021 IFIP WG 12.5 International Workshops (AIAI 2021)

Abstract

This paper presents the evaluation results of an improved version of an interactive tool for energy demand and supply forecasting, based on the combination of explainable machine learning with visual analytics. The prototype applies a kNN algorithm to forecast energy demand and supply from historical data (consumption, production, weather) and presents the results in an interactive visual dashboard. The dashboard allows the user to understand how the forecast relates to the input parameters and to analyse different forecast alternatives. It provides small utilities not familiar with AI with an easily understandable, while sufficiently accurate tool for energy forecasting in prosumer scenarios. The evaluation of the forecast accuracy has shown our method to be only 0.26%–1.73% less accurate than more sophisticated, but less explainable machine learning methods. Moreover, the achieved accuracy (MAPE 5.06%) is sufficient for practical needs of the application scenario. The evaluation with potential end-users also provided positive results regarding the usability, understandability and usefulness for the intended application context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://dash.plotly.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://rapidminer.com/.

References

  1. Paulescu, M., Brabec, M., Remus, B., Viorel, B.: Structured, physically inspired (gray box) models versus black box modeling for forecasting the output power of photovoltaic plants. Energy 121, 792–802 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad, T., Huanxin, C.: Nonlinear autoregressive and random forest approach to forecasting electricity load for utility energy management systems. Sustain. Urban Areas 45, 460–473 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Linardatos, P., Vasilis, P., Sotiris, K.: Explainable AI: review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy 23, 2021 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shin, D.: The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 146, 1–10 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Revina, A., Buza, K., Meister, V.: IT ticket classification: the simpler, the better. IEEE Access 8, 193380–193395 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Filz, M., Gellrich, S., Herrmann, C., Thiede, S.: Data-driven analysis of product state propagation in manufacturing systems using visual analytics and machine learning. In: 53rd CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hock, K.P., McGuiness, D.: Future state visualization in power grid. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, C., Nagy, Z., Schlueter, A.: A review of unsupervised statistical learning and visual analytics techniques applied to performance analysis of non-residential buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1365–1377 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimaldo, A.I., Novak, J.: Combining machine learning with visual analytics for explainable forecasting of energy demand in prosumer scenarios. Proc. Comput. Sci. 175, 525–532 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kandakatla, A., Chandan, V., Kundu, S., Chakraborty, I., Cook, K., Dasgupta, A.: Towards trust-augmented visual analytics for data-driven energy modeling. In: 2020 IEEE Workshop on TRust and EXpertise in Visual Analytics (TREX), pp. 16–21 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Markus, A.F., Kors, J.A., Rijnbeek, P.R.: The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence health care: a comprehensive survey of the terminology, design and evaluation strategies. J. Biomed. Inform. 113, 1–11 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D.: A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Comput. Surv. 5, 1–42 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dam, H.K., Tran, T., Ghose, A.: Explainable software analytics. In: ICSE 2018 NIER, Gothenburg, Sweden (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anwar, T., Sharma, B., Chakraborty, K., Sirohia, H.: Introduction to load forecasting. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 119, 1527–1538 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dong, Y., Ma, X., Fu, T.: Electrical load forecasting: a deep learning approach based on k-nearest neighbours. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 99(1–15), 106900 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grimaldo, A.I., Novak, J.: User-centered visual analytics approach for interactive and explainable energy demand analysis in prosumer scenarios. In: Tzovaras, D., Giakoumis, D., Vincze, M., Argyros, A. (eds.) ICVS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11754, pp. 700–710. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34995-0_64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghalehkhondabi, I., Ardjmand, E., Weckman, G.R., Young, W.A.: An overview of energy demand forecasting methods published in 2005–2015. Energy Syst. 8(2), 411–447 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-016-0203-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The SIT4Energy project has received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) in the context of the Greek-German Call for Proposals on Bilateral Research and Innovation Cooperation. We thank Stadtwerk Haßfurt for their cooperation and support of this work with input from their practice and experiences as small but innovative utility and to all participants of the workshop.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Grimaldo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Grimaldo, A., Novak, J. (2021). Explainable Needn’t Be (Much) Less Accurate: Evaluating an Explainable AI Dashboard for Energy Forecasting. In: Maglogiannis, I., Macintyre, J., Iliadis, L. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations. AIAI 2021 IFIP WG 12.5 International Workshops. AIAI 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 628. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79157-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79157-5_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79156-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79157-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy