Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has become a relatively common MR imaging technique in only 10 years. DTI can provide important information of brain microstructure in vivo. Many quantitative DTI analysis methods utilize either region of interest (ROI) or voxel-wise whole-brain methods. ROI methods do not require potentially bias-inducing image data altering, e.g., resampling and smoothing, and are the preferred method in clinical settings. We present an automated pipeline for quantitative ROI analysis of brain DTI data. The pipeline includes pre-processing, registrations, and calculation of mean (and SD) DTI scalar values from the automated ROIs. In addition to atlas regions, the pipeline accepts freehand ROIs, as long as the frame of reference is also provided. By the uniquely designed pipeline, we ensure that the results can be retrospectively compared to previously conducted manual freehand ROI measurement results, if desired. We validated the feasibility of the pipeline by comparing manual freehand ROI measurement results from 40 subjects against the results obtained from automated ROIs. A single set of freehand ROIs (drawn similarly to the original freehand manual ROIs in the population) was input to the pipeline, and the resulting scalar values from the automated ROIs were compared to the manual freehand ROIs’ data. Adopting a limit for goodness of fit of z = ± 1.6 resulted in 94 % success rate for the pipeline’s automated ROI registrations in the whole population. The pipeline can reduce the time taken in clinical ROI measurements.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
1. Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Field AS (2007) Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain. Neurotherapeutics 4:316–29. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.011
2. Wheeler-Kingshott CAM, Cercignani M (2009) About “axial” and “radial” diffusivities. Magn Reson Med 61:1255–1260. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21965
3. Hulkower MB, Poliak DB, Rosenbaum SB, et al (2013) A decade of DTI in traumatic brain injury: 10 years and 100 articles later. Am J Neuroradiol 34:2064–2074. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3395
4. Hakulinen U, Brander A, Ryymin P, et al (2012) Repeatability and variation of region-of-interest methods using quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain. BMC Med Imaging 12:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-30
5. Farquharson S, Tournier J-D, Calamante F, et al (2013) White matter fiber tractography: why we need to move beyond DTI. J Neurosurg 118:1367–77. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.JNS121294
6. Wang Y, Gupta A, Liu Z, et al (2011) DTI registration in atlas based fiber analysis of infantile Krabbe disease. Neuroimage 55:1577–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.038
7. Radoeva PD, Coman IL, Antshel KM, et al (2012) Atlas-based white matter analysis in individuals with velo-cardio-facial syndrome (22q11.2 deletion syndrome) and unaffected siblings. Behav Brain Funct 8:38. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-38
8. Oishi K, Faria A, Jiang H, et al (2009) Atlas-based whole brain white matter analysis using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping: application to normal elderly and Alzheimer’s disease participants. Neuroimage 46:486–499.
9. Woolrich MW, Jbabdi S, Patenaude B, et al (2009) Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage 45:S173-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.055
10. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, et al (2012) FSL. Neuroimage 62:782–790. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015
11. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S (2002) Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17:825–841.
12. Andersson JLR, Jenkinson M, Smith S (2007) Non-linear registration aka Spatial normalisation FMRIB Technial Report TR07JA2. In Pract 22.
13. Wang Y, Shen Y, Liu D, et al (2017) Evaluations of diffusion tensor image registration based on fiber tractography. Biomed Eng Online 16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0299-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ilvesmäki, T., Hakulinen, U., Eskola, H. (2018). Automated Pipeline for Brain ROI Analysis with Results Comparable to Previous Freehand Measures in Clinical Settings. In: Eskola, H., Väisänen, O., Viik, J., Hyttinen, J. (eds) EMBEC & NBC 2017. EMBEC NBC 2017 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 65. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_159
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_159
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5121-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5122-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)