Skip to main content
Log in

Does difference in stem design affect accuracy of stem alignment in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system?

  • Original Article
  • Artificial Skin, Muscle, Bone / Joint, Neuron
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system to accurately position the stem for intended alignment is unclear. In addition, the influence of stem design on the accuracy of insertion is unknown. We therefore retrospectively compared the accuracy and precision for the intended alignment of two different designs of femoral stem which were implanted with or without the navigation system. Forty-nine total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using a tapered wedge stem and 91 THAs using an anatomic stem were evaluated for the navigation group. Thirty-three THAs using the tapered wedge stem and 15 THAs using the anatomic stem were controls for the non-navigation group. Differences between postoperative measurement and preoperative planning were compared among the groups. In the navigation groups, accuracy (mean absolute difference) and precision (95% limits of agreement) of stem anteversion were 4.3° and ± 10.1° in the tapered wedge stem and 3.1° and ± 6.9° in the anatomic stem. In the non-navigation groups, these were 6.0° and ± 15.2° and 4.8° and ± 12.4°, respectively. The accuracy and precision in the navigation groups were significantly superior to those in the non-navigation group, and those in the anatomic stem group were significantly superior to those in the tapered wedge group. Using the CT-based navigation system, the accuracy and precision for intended stem anteversion were improved. When compared under guidance of navigation system, the accuracy and precision for intended stem anteversion in the anatomic stem were superior to those in the tapered wedge stem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerhardt DM, Sanders RJ, de Visser E, van Susante JL. Excessive polyethylene wear and acetabular bone defects from standard use of a hooded acetabular insert in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2014;38:1585–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bader R, Steinhauser E, Zimmermann S, Mittelmeier W, Scholz R, Busch R. Differences between the wear couples metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic in the stability against dislocation of total hip replacement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15:711–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Traina F, De Fine M, Bordini B, Toni A. Risk factors for ceramic liner fracture after total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2012;22:607–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen PY, Wu CT, Hou CH, Hou SM. Loosening of total hip arthroplasty with a prosthesis employing a skirted femoral head. J Formos Med Assoc. 2005;104:370–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shon WY, Baldini T, Peterson MG, Wright TM, Salvati EA. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2005;20:427–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:815–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Digioia AM 3rd, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY, Moody JE Jr, Nikou C, Labarca RS, Levison TJ, Picard F. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplast. 2002;17:359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hananouchi T, Takao M, Nishii T, Miki H, Iwana D, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Comparison of navigation accuracy in THA between the mini-anterior and -posterior approaches. Int J Med Robot. 2009;5:20–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iwana D, Nakamura N, Miki H, Kitada M, Hananouchi T, Sugano N. Accuracy of angle and position of the cup using computed tomography-based navigation systems in total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2013;18:187–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirasawa N, Matsubara M, Ishii K, Hagio S, Okuda N, Sekiya I, Muneta T. Effect of CT slice thickness on accuracy of implant positioning in navigated total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2010;15:83–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitada M, Nakamura N, Iwana D, Kakimoto A, Nishii T, Sugano N. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography–based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. J Arthroplast. 2011;26:674–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakahara I, Kyo T, Kuroda Y, Miki H. Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system. J Artif Organs. 2018;21:340–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taniguchi N, Jinno T, Koga D, Hagino T, Okawa A, Haro H. Cementless hip stem anteversion in the dysplastic hip: a comparison of tapered wedge vs metaphyseal filling. J Arthroplast. 2017;32:1547–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E, Salama JK, Ochi T, Tullos HS. The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1998;80:711–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14:231–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:148–65.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Watanabe Y, Masumoto J, Sasama T, Sato Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Tamura S. Preprocessing method for rigid registration between pre- and postoperative CT images in total hip replacement. Med Imag Tech. 2003;21:358–68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haraguchi K, Sugano N, Nishii T, Koyama T, Nishihara S, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T. Comparison of fit and fill between anatomic stem and straight tapered stem using virtual implantation on the ORTHODOC workstation. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6:290–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kyo T, Nakahara I, Kuroda Y, Miki H. Effects of coordinate-system construction methods on postoperative computed tomography evaluation of implant orientation after total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2015;20:52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Miki H. Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3054–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ichiro Nakahara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakahara, I., Kyo, T., Kuroda, Y. et al. Does difference in stem design affect accuracy of stem alignment in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system?. J Artif Organs 24, 74–81 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-020-01196-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-020-01196-7

Keywords

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy