Skip to main content

A Formal Ontology Reasoning with Individual Optimization: A Realization of the Semantic Web

  • Conference paper
Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2005 (WISE 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3806))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Answering a query over a group of RDF data pages is a trivial process. However, in the Semantic Web, there is a need for ontology technology. Consequently, OWL, a family of web ontology languages based on description logic, has been proposed for the Semantic Web. Answering a query over the SemanticWeb is thus not trivial, but a deductive process. However, the reasoning on OWL with data has an efficiency problem. Thus, we introduce optimization techniques for the inference algorithm. This work demonstrates the techniques for instance checking and instance retrieval problems with respect to \(\mathcal{ALC}\) description logic which covers certain parts of OWL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akahani, J., Hiramatsu, K., Kogure, K.: Coordinating heterogeneous information services based on approximate ontology translation. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2002 Workshop on Agentcities: Challenges in Open Agent Systems, pp. 10–14 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arens, Y., Hsu, C., Knoblock, C.A.: Query processing in the sims information mediator. In: Advanced Planning Technology (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berners-Lee, T.: Weaving the Web: the Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by its Inventor, HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Nutt, W.: The complexity of concept languages. In: Allen, J., Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1991), Massachusetts, pp. 151–162 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donini, F.M., Massacci, F.: Exptime tableaux for \(\mathcal{ALC}\). Artificial Intelligence 124(1), 87–138 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Goh, C.H.: Representing and Reasoning about Semantic Conflicts in Heterogeneous Information Sources. PhD thesis, MIT (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodchild, A.: Database Discovery in the Organizational Environment. PhD thesis, University of Queensland (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: Optimization strategies for instance retrieval. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horrocks, I., Li, L., Turi, D., Bechhofer, S.: The instance store: Description logic reasoning with large numbers of individuals. In: International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2004), pp. 31–40 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McGuinness, D.L., Fikes, R., Stein, L.A., Hendler, J.: Daml-ont: An ontology language for the semantic web. In: Fensel, D., Hendler, J., Lieberman, H., Wahlster, W. (eds.) Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to its Full Potential. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mena, E., Kashyap, V., Sheth, A., Illarramendi, A.: Observer: An approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperability between pre-existing ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 1st IFCIS: International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, CoopIS 1996 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I.: Rdfs(fa): A dl-ised sub-language of rdfs. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stuckenschmidt, H.: Query processing on the semantic web. Künstliche Intelligenz 17 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tessaris, S.: Questions and Answers: Reasoning and Querying in Description Logic. PhD thesis, University of Manchester (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wache, H., Vögele, T., Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G., Neumann, H., Hübner, S.: Ontology-based integration of information - a survey of existing approaches. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2001 Workshop: Ontologies and Information Sharing, pp. 108–117 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pothipruk, P., Governatori, G. (2005). A Formal Ontology Reasoning with Individual Optimization: A Realization of the Semantic Web. In: Ngu, A.H.H., Kitsuregawa, M., Neuhold, E.J., Chung, JY., Sheng, Q.Z. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2005. WISE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3806. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11581062_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11581062_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30017-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32286-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy