Abstract
A computer program is described that is designed to reconstruct the metric configuration of a set of points in Euclidean space on the basis of essentially nonmetric information about that configuration. A minimum set of Cartesian coordinates for the points is determined when the only available information specifies for each pair of those points—not the distance between them—but some unknown, fixed monotonic function of that distance. The program is proposed as a tool for reductively analyzing several types of psychological data, particularly measures of interstimulus similarity or confusability, by making explicit the multidimensional structure underlying such data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, R. P. and Sermat, V. Multidimensional scaling of facial expressions.J. exp. Psychol, in press.
Attneave, F. Dimensions of similarity.Amer. J. Psychol, 1950,63, 516–556.
Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., and Roseborough, M. E. Channels of communication in small groups.Amer. sociol. Rev., 1951,16, 461–468.
Bennett, J. F. and Hays, W. L. Multidimensional unfolding: Determining the dimensionality of ranked preference data.Psychometrika, 1960,25, 27–43.
Coxeter, H. S. M.Regular polytopes. London: Methuen, 1948.
Ekman, G. Dimensions of color vision.J. Psychol., 1954,38, 467–474.
Green, B. F. and Anderson, L. K. The tactual identification of shapes for coding switch handles.J. appl. Psychol., 1955,39, 219–226.
Hammersley, J. M. The distribution of distances in a hypersphere.Ann. math. Statist., 1950,21, 447–452.
Harman, H. H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1960.
Keller, F. S. and Taubman, R. E. Studies in international morse code. II. Errors made in code reception.J. appl. Psychol., 1943,27, 504–509.
Lord, R. D. The distribution of distance in a hypersphere.Ann. math. Statist., 1954,25, 794–798.
Plotkin, L. Stimulus generalization in morse code learning.Arch. Psychol., 1943,40, No. 287.
Rothkopf, E. Z. Signal similarity and reception errors in early morse code training. In G. Finch and F. Cameron (Eds.), Symposium on Air Force human engineering, personnel, and training research. Washington: National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council Publication 455, 1956. Pp. 229–235.
Rothkopf, E. Z. A measure of stimulus similarity and errors in some paired-associate learning tasks.J. exp. Psychol., 1957,53, 94–101.
Seashore, H. and Kurtz, A. K. Analysis of errors in copying code. Washington, D. C.: Office of Scientific Research and Development, Rep. No. 4010, 1944.
Shepard, R. N. Multidimensional scaling of concepts based upon sequences of restricted associative responses.Amer. Psychologist, 1957,12, 440–441. (Abstract)
Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 325–345.
Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.J. exp. Psychol., 1958,55, 509–523.
Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: Deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model.Psychol. Rev., 1958,65, 242–256.
Shepard, R. N. Similarity of stimuli and metric properties of behavioral data. In H. Gulliksen and S. Messick (Eds.),Psychological scaling: theory and method. New York: Wiley, 1960. Pp. 33–43.
Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shepard, R.N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I.. Psychometrika 27, 125–140 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289630
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289630