Abstract
The main usefulness of groundwater vulnerability assessment maps is their ability to be an effective preliminary tool for planning, policy, and operational levels of decision-making. DRASTIC is one such assessment method. The DRASTIC index is made up of a calculated sum of products rating and weights for seven hydrogeological parameters that contribute to aquifer vulnerability. With the help of GIS, and based on the available data, maps of DRASTIC parameters were prepared for the Gaza Strip area in a case study. Each map was given a proper rate and a special weight factor developed. The final vulnerability map was obtained as a summation of the seven maps after multiplying each one with the appropriate weight. The vulnerability map was checked against the actual pollution potential in the area and nitrate concentration. The obtained vulnerability map is strongly correlated to known pollution values in the area.






Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aller L, Lehr J, Petty R (1986) DRASTIC: a standardized system to evaluate groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. In: Proceedings of the NWWA/API conference on petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in groundwater, pp 38–57
Applied Research Institute Jerusalem (ARIJ) (1994) Gaza environmental profile, technical report, Jerusalem
Baalousha H (2004) Risk assessment and uncertainty analysis in groundwater modeling. Shaker, Germany
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (2000) Natural attenuation to groundwater remediation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Drinking water regulations and health advisors, technical report. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (1995) National farm data handbook, occupied territories (West Bank and Gaza Strip). United Nations, New York
Fritch TG, McKnight CL, Yelderman JC, Arnold JG (2000). An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Paluxy Aquifer, central Texas, USA using GIS and a modified DRASTIC approach. Environ Manage 25:337–345
GAO (US General Accounting Office) (1992) Groundwater protection: validity and feasibility of EPA’s differential protection strategy. GAO/PEMD-93-6, Washington, DC
Ibe KM, Nwankwor GI, Onyekuru SO (2001) Assessment of ground water vulnerability and its application to the development of protection strategy for the water supply aquifer in Owerri, Southeastern Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess 67:323–360
Lynch SD, Reynders AG, Schulze RE (1997) A DRASTIC approach to groundwater vulnerability in South Africa. South Afric J Sci 93:59–60
Melloul A, Yesraeli N (1991) Hydrogeological atlas of Israel. Agricultural Ministry and Water Authority (in Hebrew)
Ministry of Planning and International Co-operation (MOPIC) (1996a) Atlas maps of the Gaza Strip
Ministry of Planning and International Co-operation (MOPIC) (1996b) Gaza Water Resources, technical report Nr. 1
Padagett D (1994) Using DRASTIC to improve the integrity of geographical information system data used for solid waste management facility sitting, a case study. Environ Prof 16:211–219
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) (2000) Projected mid-year population in the Palestinian territory by age, sex and region
Palestinian Water Authority (PWA) (2001) Hydrological data book, technical report. Gaza Strip
Shomar B, Müller G, Yahya A (2005) Geochemical features of topsoil in the Gaza Strip: natural occurrence and anthropogenic inputs. Environ Res 98:372–382
US Geological Survey (1998) Overview of Middle East water resources. Water Resources of Palestinian, Jordanian, and Israeli interest. Technical report
Vrba J, Zaporozec A (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International contributions to hydrogeology Nr. 16, Hannover
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baalousha, H. Vulnerability assessment for the Gaza Strip, Palestine using DRASTIC. Environ Geol 50, 405–414 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0219-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0219-z