Abstract
As an application-driven network, wireless sensor network generally requires data reliability to maintain detection and response capabilities. Although two approaches, namely, retransmission and redundancy, have been proposed to enhance data reliability, the theoretical work is required to evaluate their impact on transmission reliability and energy efficiency. In this paper, we offer a comprehensive theoretical study on packet arrival probability and average energy consumption for both approaches. Our analysis and simulations indicate that when loss probabilities remain low or moderate, erasure coding, a typical redundancy-based scheme, is more energy efficient than retransmission. We also demonstrate that the resistance capability of erasure coding against packet loss weakens as the hop number increases, which motivates us to propose two improved mechanism based on the idea of the loss detection and the loss recovery. Finally, the simulation results carried out using TOSSIM verify the performance of different mechanisms both in the chain topology and the tree topology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhao J, Govindan R. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st International conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Los Angeles, 2003. 1–13
Balakrishnan H, Padmanabhan V, Seshan S, et al. A comparison of mechanisms for improving TCP performance over wireless links. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking, 1997, 5: 756–769
Wang C, Sohraby K, Li B, et al. A survey of transport protocols for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Network, 2006, 20: 34–40
Stann F, Heidemann J. RMST: Reliable data transport in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, Anchorage, 2003. 102–112
Wan C Y, Campbell A T, Krishnamurthy L. PSFQ: A reliable transport protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the First ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, Atlanta, 2002. 1–11
Kim S, Fonseca R, Culler D. Reliable transfer on wireless sensor networks. In: The 1st Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, Santa Clara, 2004. 449–459
Kumar R, Paul A, Ramachandran U, et al. On Improving wireless broadcast reliability of sensor networks using erasure codes. In: Proceeding of Second International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks, Hong Kong, 2006. 155–170
Shih E, Calhoun B H, Cho S H, et al. Energy-efficient link layer for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings IEEE Computer Society Workshop on VLSI, Orlando, 2001. 16–21
Xu Y, Lee W, Xu J. Analysis of a loss-resilient proactive data transmission protocol in wireless sensor networks. In: 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, 2007. 1712–1720
IEEE. IEEE Standard 802. 15. 4 TM. IEEE Press: New York. 2003
Ye W, Heidemann J, Estrin D. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of 21st Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies IEEE INFOCOM, New York, 2002. 1567–1576
Rangwala S, Gummadi R, Govindan R. et al. Interference-aware fair rate control in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, Pisa, 2006. 63–74
Luo J, Jiang L G, He C. An analytical model for SMAC protocol in multi-hop wireless sensor networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2010, 53: 2323–2331
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wen, H., Lin, C., Ren, F. et al. Retransmission or redundancy: Transmission reliability study in wireless sensor networks. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 55, 737–746 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4358-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4358-9