Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Stryn (talk | contribs) at 16:29, 12 April 2016 (Tietew@jawiki: d). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure. Minimum voting requirement are listed here.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case this is for multiple users, leave this field blank and give a list of these users in your remarks.
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See Administrator for information about this user group.

  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.

  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

handrian@el.wikivoyage

My temporary adminship on el.wikivoyage is almost over for the second time. I request to be extended for one or two more year. I have also posted about it over here. Thank you very much. Handrian (talk) 07:40, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold till 11 April. ~ Nahid Talk 09:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2017-04-10. Ajraddatz (talk) 03:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geoleplubo@pcdwiki

Bonjour, I had rights for adminship from 25 december 2012 and I was granted for 1 year to expire on 2016-04-10. I am requesting a prolongation of my adminship statut and if possible for a permanent adminship. Thanks, Geoleplubo (talk) 23:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On hold for a week, to allow for local discussion. Ajraddatz (talk) 23:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nirmos@svwikiversity

Hi. I would like temporary adminship on Swedish Wikiversity to update old JavaScript. The project does not have any bureaucrats. No one has opposed to this at sv:v:Wikiversity:Café#JavaScript. Nirmos (talk) 08:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nirmos: But as far as I understand through google translator, you didn't mention that you're applying for admin rights. Please make an announcement about your adminship and come back here if no one oppose. ~ Nahid Talk 15:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maathavan@tawikiquote

I want to get temporary adminship on tamil wikiquote. There is no Bureaucrat or sysops. I announced locally.--Maathavan (talk) 04:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold till April 15th. ~ Nahid Talk 16:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stalinjeet@pa.wiktionary

(your remarks) Stalinjeet (talk)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-10-11. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. ~ Nahid Talk 19:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

‎Hunnjazal@hiwikipedia

4 votes and 2 users support for 3 months. Sfic (talk) 06:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-07-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. ~ Nahid Talk 08:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aniket@gu.wikipedia

he is nominate as a permenant admin. last adminship is 4 month. 2 user full support. one user NehaldaveND is not active on gu.wikipedia. i will support only for 3 month. the reason writen on bellow of ટિપ્પણી section on RFA Discussion.--Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 09:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{TempSysop}} ~ Nahid Talk 13:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal was put forward by existing SysOp and voting for "Permanent SysOp" in Local Gujarati Wiki Community was opened just yesterday and being small community, people take time to vote. I feel voting was closed prematurely. In addition, user Aniket is oldest active user in Gujrati Wiki community, hence deserves to be permanent SysOp after successful completion of first temporary term and that was the reason community put the proposal and started voting.--Aniket (talk) 16:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold I've read the date wrong, thanks for pointing it to me. Set on hold for at least a week. ~ Nahid Talk 16:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rachmat04@acewikipedia

I'd like to request administrator access to this wiki as my previous temporary admin access has expired. If it is possible, I request for a long-term adminship instead temporary one. Thank you. ··· 👦 Rachmat04 · 💬 12:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rachmat04: please fix the local link above, it's broken. ~ Nahid Talk 13:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NahidSultan: Sorry, my bad. Link fixed. ··· 👦 Rachmat04 · 💬 13:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See Bureaucrat for information about this user group.
  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
  • A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.


CheckUser access

See CheckUser policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.


Oversight access

See Oversight policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .

  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.

Removal of access

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

Pred@dawiki

No edits since 2015-08-14 and no logged actions since 2015-08-09; user notified 2016-03-10. Please remove the sysop flag. Christian Giersing (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for their service ~ Nahid Talk 19:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Defender@ptwikiquote

Please remove my sysop flag on ptwikiquote. My activity there hasn't improved for years, and I prefer to focus on Meta, global patrolling and content work on the Portuguese Wiktionary. Thanks. Defender (talk) 22:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On hold for 24 hours, as per standard practice. RadiX 00:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chaddy@barwiki

--Holder (talk) 10:10, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done- Thanks for their service. ~ Nahid Talk 13:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tietew@jawiki

This user is inactive over 3 months. Please remove sysop rights from this user, as per removal policy for inactivity. Thanks --rxy (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Stryn (talk) 16:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Requests for permissions that don't fit in other sections belong here. Importer rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only. Please gain local community consensus before posting a new section here.

Note that the following types of permissions requests belong on separate pages:

  • SRB — Local or global bot status
  • SRGP — Global permissions

User শাহাদাত সায়েম@WB

What is the request? QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@QuiteUnusual Importer in bangla wikibooks. শাহাদাত সায়েম (talk) 10:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't look like the people commenting support your application. Also, would the transwiki right suffice for this? Ajraddatz (talk) 16:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That depends if on bn.wikibooks have configured import sources. If no import sources exist, they should request at Phabricator (Wikimedia-site-requests project) to configure them. I agree that transwiki is potentially less harmful than import. —MarcoAurelio 16:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
oh Yes শাহাদাত সায়েম (talk) 12:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy