Skip to content

fix(nuxt): show fatal errors thrown in middleware #31518

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025
Merged

Conversation

danielroe
Copy link
Member

🔗 Linked issue

resolves #22731

📚 Description

this handles two additional ways errors can be thrown in middleware - either directly returning a fatal error or throwing an error.

in either case this is checked for the fatal property (which triggers showing an error page). Otherwise the error is returned to vue router for handling there.

@danielroe danielroe self-assigned this Mar 24, 2025
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce improvements to error handling during middleware execution in the routing process. A new import, isNuxtError, is added from the #app/composables/error module. The middleware variable is explicitly typed as RouteMiddleware. The middleware execution is wrapped in a try-catch block to manage errors effectively; if an error occurs, a new error is created using createError(err). If this error is deemed fatal, the showError function is called to present the error. Furthermore, the result of the middleware execution is assessed; if it is an instance of isNuxtError and is fatal, the showError function is also invoked. These modifications enhance the robustness of error handling in middleware processing.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b65f209 and 8fb2336.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/bundle.test.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/bundle.test.ts (1)

120-120: The bundle size increase is expected and reasonable.

The server bundle size has increased from 280k to 281k, which is a minimal 1KB increase. This aligns with the PR's objective of improving error handling for middleware, where the additional code for checking fatal errors and displaying appropriate error pages would naturally result in a slightly larger bundle size.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/nuxt/src/pages/runtime/plugins/router.ts (1)

215-215: Consider replacing the any type for better maintainability.
Using (r: any) => r.default || r may introduce uncertainty around the imported module type. Providing a more precise type instead of any will improve type safety and future refactoring.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2124b3 and b65f209.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/nuxt/src/pages/runtime/plugins/router.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
packages/nuxt/src/pages/runtime/plugins/router.ts (2)
packages/nuxt/src/app/composables/router.ts (1)
  • RouteMiddleware (45-47)
packages/nuxt/src/app/composables/error.ts (3)
  • createError (63-78)
  • showError (19-41)
  • isNuxtError (58-60)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: codeql (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: code
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/nuxt/src/pages/runtime/plugins/router.ts (3)

15-15: No issues with the new imports.
The additional imports for clearError, isNuxtError, showError and useError neatly align with the subsequent usage in this file’s error-handling flow and appear consistent with the PR’s objectives.


224-247: Logic for middleware result checking looks sound, but verify all return paths.
The checks for false and JavaScript Error objects effectively prevent navigation or show a 404. In line with Nuxt’s approach, returning true continues the chain, while returning a truthy value (e.g., a route) halts and redirects. Please ensure all return paths are tested to confirm expected behaviour in edge cases (e.g., thrown JavaScript errors vs. custom Nuxt errors).


248-252: Fatal error handling is properly segregated.
Catching errors and rethrowing them as fatal using showError aligns with the updated error-handling approach. Returning the error for non-fatal scenarios is consistent with the new logic. No further concerns.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Open in Stackblitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@31518

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@31518

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@31518

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@31518

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@31518

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@31518

commit: 8fb2336

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 24, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #31518 will not alter performance

Comparing fix/middleware-errors (8fb2336) with main (f2124b3)

Summary

✅ 10 untouched benchmarks

@danielroe danielroe merged commit 69c0d5d into main Mar 26, 2025
46 checks passed
@danielroe danielroe deleted the fix/middleware-errors branch March 26, 2025 10:24
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unable to render error from route middleware
1 participant
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy