Skip to main content

Metaproperty-Guided Deletion from the Instance-Level of a Knowledge Base

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11313))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The ontology modeling practice of engineering metaproperties of concepts is a well-known technique. Some metaproperties of concepts describe the dynamics of concept instances, i.e. how instances can and cannot be altered. We investigate how deletions in an ontology-based knowledge base interact with the metaproperties rigidity and dependence. A particularly useful effect are delete cascades. We evaluate how rigidity and dependence may guide delete cascades in an engineering application. A case study in the area of product development shows that beyond explicitly defined deletions, our approach achieves further automated and desirable deletions of facts with high precision and good recall.

C. Schon and P. Kügler—Work supported by DFG EVOWIPE

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://west.uni-koblenz.de/en/research/evowipe.

  2. 2.

    Implementation available at: https://github.com/Institute-Web-Science-and-Technologies/SparqlUpdater.

  3. 3.

    The KB and the questionnaire used in the case study are available at: https://west.uni-koblenz.de/sites/default/files/research/datasets/evaluation_testrig.zip.

References

  1. Ahmeti, A., Calvanese, D., Polleres, A., Savenkov, V.: Handling Inconsistencies Due to Class Disjointness in SPARQL Updates. In: Sack, H., Blomqvist, E., d’Aquin, M., Ghidini, C., Ponzetto, S.P., Lange, C. (eds.) ESWC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9678, pp. 387–404. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34129-3_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symb. Log. 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Broekstra, J., Kampman, A.: Inferencing and truth maintenance in RDF schema. In: PSSS, vol. 89, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calvanese, D., Kharlamov, E., Nutt, W., Zheleznyakov, D.: Updating ABoxes in DL-Lite. In: AMW, vol. 619, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2010). CEUR-WS.org

  5. De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Poggi, A., Rosati, R.: On instance-level update and erasure in description logic ontologies. J. Log. Comput. 19(5), 745–770 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Nutt, W., Schaerf, A.: An epistemic operator for description logics. Artif. Intell. 100(1–2), 225–274 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Furbach, U., Schon, C.: Semantically guided evolution of \(\cal{SHI}\) ABoxes. In: Galmiche, D., Larchey-Wendling, D. (eds.) TABLEAUX 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8123, pp. 134–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40537-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gasevic, D., Djuric, D., Devedzic, V.: Model Driven Engineering and Ontology Development, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00282-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Grau, B.C., Kharlamov, E., Zheleznyakov, D.: Ontology contraction: beyond the propositional paradise. In: AMW, vol. 866, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 62–74. CEUR-WS.org (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N., Welty, C.A.: An overview of OntoClean. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 201–220. Springer, Heidleberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Horridge, M.: Justification based explanation in ontologies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kharlamov, E., Zheleznyakov, D., Calvanese, D.: Capturing model-based ontology evolution at the instance level: the case of dl-lite. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 79(6), 835–872 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kügler, P., et al.: Ontology-based approach for the use of intentional forgetting in product development. In: Marjanovic, D., Storga, M., Pavkovic, N., Bojcetic, N., Skec, S. (eds.) DESIGN 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lenzerini, M., Savo, D.F.: On the evolution of the instance level of DL-Lite knowledge bases. In: Description Logics, vol. 745, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, H., Lutz, C., Milicic, M., Wolter, F.: Foundations of instance level updates in expressive description logics. Artif. Intell. 175(18), 2170–2197 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: Foundations for uniform interpolation and forgetting in expressive description logics. In: IJCAI, pp. 989–995. IJCAI/AAAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McGuinness, D., Kendall, E., Bao, J., Patel-Schneider, P.: OWL 2 web ontology language quick reference guide (second edition). Technical report, W3C, December 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-quick-reference-20121211/

  19. Moodley, K.: Debugging and repair of description logic ontologies. Master’s thesis, University of KwaZulo-Natal, Durban, South Africa (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Motik, B., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Adding integrity constraints to OWL. In: OWLED, vol. 258, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simons, P.: Parts: A Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. J. Web Sem. 5(2), 51–53 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Schon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schon, C., Staab, S., Kügler, P., Kestel, P., Schleich, B., Wartzack, S. (2018). Metaproperty-Guided Deletion from the Instance-Level of a Knowledge Base. In: Faron Zucker, C., Ghidini, C., Napoli, A., Toussaint, Y. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. EKAW 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11313. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03667-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03667-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03666-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03667-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy