Skip to main content

A Model-Based Extension to HiP-HOPS for Dynamic Fault Propagation Studies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Based Safety and Assessment (IMBSA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10437))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

HiP-HOPS is a model-based approach for assessing the dependability of safety-critical systems. The method combines models, logic, probabilities and nature-inspired algorithms to provide advanced capabilities for design optimisation, requirement allocation and safety argument generation. To deal with dynamic systems, HiP-HOPS has introduced temporal operators and a temporal logic to represent and assess event sequences in component failure modelling. Although this approach has been shown to work, it is not entirely consistent with the way designers tend to express operational dynamics in models which show mode and state sequences. To align HiP-HOPS better with typical design techniques, in this paper, we extend the method with the ability to explicitly consider different modes of operation. With this added capability HiP-HOPS can create and analyse temporal fault trees from architectural models of a system which are augmented with mode information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vesely, W.E., Stamatelatos, M., Dugan, J., Fragola, J., Minarick, J., Railsback, J.: Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications. NASA office of safety and mission assurance, Washington D.C. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joshi, A., Heimdahl, M.P.E., Miller, S.P., Whalen, M.W.: Model-based safety analysis. NASA Technical report, Hampton, VA, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fenelon, P., McDermid, J.A.: An integrated toolset for software safety analysis. J. Syst. Softw. 21, 279–290 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Papadopoulos, Y., McDermid, J.A.: Hierarchically performed hazard origin and propagation studies. In: Felici, M., Kanoun, K. (eds.) SAFECOMP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1698, pp. 139–152. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). doi:10.1007/3-540-48249-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold, A., Point, G., Griffault, A., Rauzy, A.: The AltaRica formalism for describing concurrent systems. Fundam. Inform. 40, 109–124 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozzano, M., Villafiorita, A.: The FSAP/NuSMV-SA safety analysis platform. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. Spec. Sect. Adv. Autom. Verif. Crit. Syst. 9, 5–24 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feiler, P., Rugina, A.: Dependability modeling with the architecture analysis & design language (AADL). Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aizpurua, J.I., Muxika, E.: Model-based design of dependable systems: limitations and evolution of analysis and verification approaches. Int. J. Adv. Secur. 6, 12–31 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharvia, S., Kabir, S., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y.: Model-based dependability analysis: state-of-the-art, challenges, and future outlook. In: Software Quality Assurance: In Large Scale and Complex Software-Intensive Systems, pp. 251–278 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walker, M.: Pandora: a logic for the qualitative analysis of temporal fault trees. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hull (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rauzy, A.: Mode automata and their compilation into fault trees. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 78, 1–12 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papadopoulos, Y., Walker, M., Parker, D., Sharvia, S., Bottaci, L., Kabir, S., Azevedo, L., Sorokos, I.: A synthesis of logic and bio-inspired techniques in the design of dependable systems. Ann. Rev. Control 41, 170–182 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papadopoulos, Y., Mcdermid, J., Sasse, R., Heiner, G.: Analysis and synthesis of the behaviour of complex programmable electronic systems in conditions of failure. RESS 71, 229–247 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Lafortune, S., Sinnamohideen, K., Teneketzis, D.: Failure diagnosis using discrete-event models. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 4, 105–124 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kabir, S., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y.: Quantitative evaluation of pandora temporal fault trees via petri nets. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48, 458–463 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kabir, S., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y.: Reliability analysis of dynamic systems by translating temporal fault trees into Bayesian networks. In: Ortmeier, F., Rauzy, A. (eds.) IMBSA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8822, pp. 96–109. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12214-4_8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Labeau, P.E., Smidts, C., Swaminathan, S.: Dynamic reliability: towards an integrated platform for probabilistic risk assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 68, 219–254 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly funded by the DEIS H2020 project (Grant Agreement 732242).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohag Kabir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kabir, S. et al. (2017). A Model-Based Extension to HiP-HOPS for Dynamic Fault Propagation Studies. In: Bozzano, M., Papadopoulos, Y. (eds) Model-Based Safety and Assessment. IMBSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10437. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64119-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64119-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64118-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64119-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy