Cited By
View all- Elsharkawy ANaheem KKoo DKim M(2021)A UWB-Driven Self-Actuated Projector Platform for Interactive Augmented Reality ApplicationsApplied Sciences10.3390/app1106287111:6(2871)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2021
Evaluating elementary student interaction with ubiquitous touch projection technology
Authors: 
Sarah M Diesburg, 
C. Adam Feldhaus, Coved Oswald, Cole Boudreau, Beau BrownAuthors Info & Claims
Sarah M Diesburg, C. Adam Feldhaus, Coved Oswald, Cole Boudreau, Beau BrownAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 357 - 364
Abstract
Ubiquitous touch projection technology is entering the market and allows touch screens to be projected onto any smooth surface at a lower cost. We created a mathematics manipulative application for a low-cost, ubiquitous touch projection system, and we conducted an observational study with 18 third-grade elementary students. Through our analysis of both video and system data, we identify common student interaction problems, evaluate how those interaction problems affect usability, engagement, and pair-work, and we make practical suggestions to aid future developers, educators, and students in using such a platform.
References
[1]
Abdul Aziz, Nor Azah, Firat Batmaz, Rob Stone, and P. W. H. Chung. 2013. Selection of touch gestures for children's applications. In Science and Information Conference (SAI), 2013, 721--726.
[2]
Nahid Golafshani. 2013. Teachers' Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics with Manipulatives. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation 36, 3: 137--159.
[3]
Eva Hornecker, Paul Marshall, Nick Sheep Dalton, and Yvonne Rogers. 2008. Collaboration and Interference: Awareness with Mice or Touch Input. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '08), 167--176.
[4]
Michael C. Hynes. 1986. Selection Criteria. Arithmetic Teacher 33, 6: 11--13.
[5]
Dietrich Kammer, René Dang, Juliane Steinhauf, and Rainer Groh. 2014. Investigating Interaction with Tabletops in Kindergarten Environments. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '14), 57--66.
[6]
Rilla Khaled, Pippin Barr, Hannah Johnston, and Robert Biddle. 2009. Let's Clean Up This Mess: Exploring Multi-touch Collaborative Play. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '09), 4441--4446.
[7]
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM, Reston, VA.
[8]
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. 2010. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Authors, Washington, DC.
[9]
National Research Council. 2001. Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. National Academies Press, Learning Mathematics Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC.
[10]
Peter Peltonen, Esko Kurvinen, Antti Salovaara, Giulio Jacucci, Tommi Ilmonen, John Evans, Antti Oulasvirta, and Petri Saarikko. 2008. It's Mine, Don'T Touch!: Interactions at a Large Multi-touch Display in a City Centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), 1285--1294.
[11]
Jochen Rick, Amanda Harris, Paul Marshall, Rowanne Fleck, Nicola Yuill, and Yvonne Rogers. 2009. Children Designing Together on a Multi-touch Tabletop: An Analysis of Spatial Orientation and User Interactions. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '09), 106--114.
[12]
Geoff Romeo, Suzy Edwards, Sue McNamara, Ian Walker, and Christopher Ziguras. 2003. Touching the screen: issues related to the use of touchscreen technology in early childhood education. British Journal of Educational Technology 34, 3: 329--339.
[13]
Evelyn J. Sowell. 1989. Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for research in mathematics education: 498--505.
[14]
Frank Zittle. 2004. Enhancing Native American mathematics learning: The use of Smartboard-generated virtual manipulatives for conceptual understanding. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 5512--5515.
[15]
Ubi Interactive. Retrieved February 21, 2015 from http://www.ubi-interactive.com/
[16]
Interactive Displays | SMART Boards - SMART Technologies. Retrieved November 11, 2017 from https://education.smarttech.com/en/products/smart-board-interactive-flat-panels
[17]
Interactive Walls | Promethean. Retrieved November 9, 2017 from https://www.prometheanworld.com/products/interactivewalls/
[18]
Interactive Whiteboard Systems | Promethean. Retrieved November 9, 2017 from https://www.prometheanworld.com/products/interactive-whiteboard-systems/#keyFeatures
[19]
Touchboards Home of Interactive Whiteboards, Projectors, Document Cameras and more | Touchboards. Retrieved November 9, 2017 from https://www.touchboards.com/
[20]
Smart board and Promethean board comparison | Touchboards. Retrieved November 11, 2017 from https://www.touchboards.com/smartboard-vs-promethean/
[21]
Luidia Inc.: Interactive Technology. Retrieved November 11, 2017 from http://www.e-beam.com/education/ebeamedge/overview.html
[22]
MimioTeach Interactive Whiteboard - IWB For the Interactive Classroom. Retrieved November 9, 2017 from https://mimio.boxlight.com/mimioteach-interactive-whiteboard/
[23]
Turn any Surface into a Touch Screen - Touchless Touch. Retrieved November 9, 2017 from http://www.touchlesstouch.com/
[24]
Xperia® Touch Official Website - Sony Mobile (United States). Retrieved November 9, 2017 from https://www.sonymobile.com/us/products/smartproducts/xperia-touch/
[25]
Education - Touchjet. Retrieved November 9, 2017 from https://www.touchjet.com/education/
[26]
Angry Birds Games. Angry Birds. Retrieved November 6, 2017 from https://www.angrybirds.com/games/
Index Terms
- Evaluating elementary student interaction with ubiquitous touch projection technology
Recommendations
Design and evaluation of interaction models for multi-touch mice
GI '10: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010Adding multi-touch sensing to the surface of a mouse has the potential to substantially increase the number of interactions available to the user. However, harnessing this increased bandwidth is challenging, since the user must perform multi-touch ...
Direct and indirect multi-touch interaction on a wall display
IHM '14: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-MachineMulti-touch wall displays allow to take advantage of co-located interaction (direct interaction) on very large surfaces. However interacting with content beyond arms' reach requires body movements, introducing fatigue and impacting performance. ...
Comparing Tangible and Multi-touch Interaction for Interactive Data Visualization Tasks
TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionInteractive visualization plays a key role in the analysis of large datasets. It can help users to explore data, investigate hypotheses and find patterns. The easier and more tangible the interaction, the more likely it is to enhance understanding. This ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2018
789 pages
ISBN:9781450351522
DOI:10.1145/3202185
- Conference Chairs:
- Michail N. Giannakos,
- Letizia Jaccheri,
- Monica Divitini
Copyright © 2018 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 19 June 2018
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
Conference
IDC '18
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
IDC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 96 submissions, 29%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%
Upcoming Conference
IDC '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 155Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)9
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Elsharkawy ANaheem KKoo DKim M(2021)A UWB-Driven Self-Actuated Projector Platform for Interactive Augmented Reality ApplicationsApplied Sciences10.3390/app1106287111:6(2871)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2021
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in