I am excited to share that I have been appointed as a Reviewer at the International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews! I am looking forward to contributing to the publication's mission of promoting high-quality research and analysis. In my first role as a Reviewer, I had the pleasure of reviewing a research paper on Sentiment Analysis on the COVID-19 Pandemic. #sentimentanalysis #covid19 #researchpaper #publishing

Systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and meta-analyses are fundamental in research and evidence synthesis. Systematic reviews offer unbiased summaries, narrative reviews provide context, and meta-analyses combine data for precise effect estimates. Understanding these differences is key to tailoring research approaches effectively. #ResearchMethods #EvidenceSynthesis #AcademicWriting

Peer Review: Unveiling Limitations, Navigating Difficulties, and Championing Best Practices for Scientific Integrity. 🔹 Understanding the Boundaries: Peer review is essential but not infallible. Delve into its limitations to comprehend its scope accurately. 🔹 Navigating the Challenges: From bias to time constraints, peer review faces various hurdles. Explore the difficulties encountered and strategies to overcome them. 🔹 Championing Integrity: Discover best practices that bolster the credibility of peer review, ensuring scientific rigor and maintaining the highest standards of integrity. 🔹 Collaborative Approach: Embrace the collective efforts of reviewers, authors, and editors to strengthen the peer review process and uphold scientific integrity. 🔹 Continuous Improvement: Reflect on evolving methodologies and technologies that enhance peer review's effectiveness while addressing its inherent challenges. 🔹 Community Engagement: Foster transparent dialogue and feedback mechanisms within the scientific community to promote accountability and trust in the peer review system. Join us on a journey to dissect the intricacies of peer review, confront its limitations, and champion best practices to safeguard scientific integrity! find out more in our latest blog post. Click the link below👇👍: https://lnkd.in/dvdc8R5S 🌐🔬 #PeerReview #ScientificIntegrity #BestPractices #ResearchCommunity 🌟

Feeling overwhelmed by the complexity of qualitative research reviews? 🤯 Don't let the vastness of qualitative research bog you down. 💪 Discover the key tasks to master qualitative research reviews. 📚 https://bit.ly/4cGMElM Imagine becoming a pro at #qualitativeresearch reviews. 🌟 - Clarify purpose(s) ✍️ - Define research quality 📊 - Situate research in relevant contexts 🌍 - Add it up ➕ - Practice reflexivity 🧠 #academicwriting #writingtips #qualitativeresearch #phd #research

In today's post from ORIGINal Thoughts, Christine Beaty, Jennifer Mahar, Christina Nelson, Kristen Overstreet, and Jason Roberts offer invaluable guidance on implementing double-anonymous peer review (DAPR). They address the question: "What practical advice would you offer for implementing DAPR, either from scratch or transitioning from a single-anonymized model?" If you’re considering adopting DAPR for your journals, this is essential reading. Introduction written by Ryan Alexander Farrell. https://lnkd.in/eKP7ascd

Massive thanks to Christine Beaty, Christina Nelson, Ryan Alexander Farrell, Kristen Overstreet and Jennifer Mahar for contributing to this important post on Double-Anonymous Peer Review (DAPR). DAPR is being talked about a lot these days as a solution to tackle the potential for bias in peer review. Several journals that Origin Editorial work with have committed to review whether DAPR should be adopted. There are clearly benefits. There are also several practical implications to ponder and these points absolutely must be a critical part of any consideration with regards to switching to a new model of peer review. In discussing the theory, don't forget about the practice and its sustainability. This ORIGINal Thoughts post will certainly contribute to those conversations you may be having.

Know the difference between Systematic Reviews vs. Meta-Analyses vs. Narrative Reviews Understanding the differences can help you choose the appropriate approach for your research needs. 📝 Pro Tips: Systematic Reviews: ✔︎Follow PRISMA guidelines to ensure transparency and rigor. ✔︎Use reference management tools to organize and document your search strategy. Meta-Analyses: ✔︎Ensure proper statistical expertise for data synthesis and interpretation. ✔︎Address potential sources of bias and heterogeneity among studies. Narrative Reviews: ✔︎Clearly articulate the rationale for study selection and interpretation. ✔︎Use narrative reviews to provide context and background for new research questions. ♻️ Repost for others :) New here? Follow and hit the bell icon 🔔 #SystematicReview #MetaAnalysis #NarrativeReview #AcademicWriting #Research

ScholarAI In Action: Literature Review Key Information Highlighting: Identify and highlight essential data points, key findings, and critical terminologies across multiple papers. Assisting you in pinpointing the most impactful elements of your research, facilitating a comprehensive review of trends and advancements. Customizable Summary Depth: Customize your summaries to fit your research needs. Whether you require a succinct overview or a detailed exploration of the methodologies and results of your papers, our tool adjusts to provide the level of insight needed for your literature review. Interactive Summaries: Engage with the summaries through our direct Q&A that allows you to pose questions and seek clarifications. Designed to deepen your understanding of complex topics and enhance your ability to critically assess and integrate research findings into your review. Try out a literature review for yourself now: https://bit.ly/3WcKcOc

We know what you've been waiting for! 🧐 🤔 Yup: The second installment of our representative data sample from #researchers & #editors acting as/handling #journal #peerreview .... Our survey said ...... 🔻🔻😎 👉 74% of all respondents say rewards have some influence on their willingness to review 👉 Editorial board/managing editors slightly underestimate the impact of rewards (57% “very much”/”to some extent”) 👉 25% are motivated by other factors (“altruists”?)  👉 23% of respondents received rewards regularly 👉 77% say they receive rarely receive rewards (40% never), or in less than 25% of the cases when they review That's not all .... there's more! 😎 👉 Peer reviewers say that rewards have a positive impact on their willingness to review 👉 The majority of reviewers did not receive (or do not remember they received) rewards 👉 They suggest they want other rewards than they get. 👉 As with every element of peer review, there are no industry standards around rewarding. 👉 Other studies (e.g. Central European University Press's upcoming study on book reviewing) suggest a higher attractiveness of direct financial rewards (84% of respondents). In case you missed ReviewerCredits Managing Director Sven Fund's rip-roaring presentation at the #APE2024 Berlin Institute for Scholarly Publishing (BISP) Conference we'll release a #whitepaper soon! #staytuned !! #peerreview #researchintegrity #researchers #journals #publishers

📈 Shape Memory and Superelasticity Editor-in-Chief Huseyin Sehitoglu is pleased to share that the journal's 2023 Impact Factor has increased to 2.6 (up from its first Impact Factor of 2.2 received last year), as announced in the 2024 edition of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) released in June by Clarivate. The journal team extends its congratulations to all contributors for their dedication and effort. This achievement can be attributed to the hard work of the journal editors, reviewers, authors, and editorial committee in acquiring and publishing high-quality impactful content. The journal’s usage increased by 81%, with the annual number of downloads rising dramatically from 82,879 in 2022 to 150,402 in 2023. The Journal Impact Factor is the ratio of last year's citations to articles published in that journal in the two previous years. The 2023 Journal Impact Factor is based on citations in 2023 to articles published in 2022 and 2021. 🔗 For more information, visit here: https://lnkd.in/eBTs373B