The scientific study of consciousness was sanctioned as an orthodox field of study only three decades ago. Since then, a variety of prominent theories have flourished, including integrated information theory, which has been recently accused of being pseudoscience by more than 100 academics. Here we critically assess this charge and offer thoughts to elevate the clash into positive lessons for our field.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
IIT-Concerned et al. Nat. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-01881-x (2025).
Tononi, G. et al. Nat. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-01880-y (2025).
Gomez-Marin, A. eNeuro 10, 0434–0423.2023 (2023).
Seth, A. K. Nautilus https://nautil.us/the-worth-of-wild-ideas-399097/ (2023).
Fleming, S. M. et al. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zsr78 (2023).
Albantakis, L. et al. PLOS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011465 (2023).
Seth, A. K. & Bayne, T. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 439–452 (2022).
Lakatos, I. in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (eds Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A.) 91–196 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1970).
The COGITATE Consortium. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.23.546249 (2023).
Pennartz, C. et al. OSF Registries https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4RN85 (2024).
Yaron, I., Melloni, L., Pitts, M. & Mudrik, L. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 593–604 (2022).
Mediano, P. A. M., Rosas, F. E., Bor, D., Seth, A. K. & Barrett, A. B. Trends Cogn. Sci. 26, 646–655 (2022).
Kuhn, R. L. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 190, 28–169 (2024).
Seth, A. K. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tz6an (2024).
Clark, C. J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2301642120 (2023).
Acknowledgements
We thank E. Rovere from Wonderstruck for the invitation to a private symposium in the summer of 2024, where both authors first met in person and where, despite their different worldviews, collegial discussions started to take place, leading to this manuscript and more. We are also grateful to A. Barrett, T. Bayne, R. Chis-Ciure, and R. L. Kuhn for insightful discussions. A.G.-M. is supported by the Spanish Research Council. A.K.S. is supported by the European Research Council under the Horizon 2020 programme (Advanced Investigator Grant agreement 101019254).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.K.S. is an advisor to Conscium Ltd. He is also on the steering committee of the Templeton World Charity Foundation Adversarial Collaboration INTREPID, which is contrasting IIT with active inference and neuro-representationalism. He is not funded by this project. A.G.-M. declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomez-Marin, A., Seth, A.K. A science of consciousness beyond pseudo-science and pseudo-consciousness. Nat Neurosci (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-01913-6
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-01913-6